Close Menu
National Security News
  • Home
  • Ukraine War
  • Russia
  • Israel
  • Iran
  • Africa
  • Tech
  • Investigations
What's Hot

Inside Iran’s IRGC: power, influence and losses in the 2026 war

April 15, 2026

US and Iran agree to provisional ceasefire as Tehran says it will reopen strait of Hormuz

April 8, 2026

Trump warns ‘a whole civilisation will die tonight’ ahead of Iran Strait of Hormuz deadline

April 7, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
National Security News
Subscribe
X (Twitter)
Login
IPSO Trusted Journalism in National Security
  • Home
  • Ukraine War
  • Russia
  • Israel
  • Iran
  • Africa
  • Tech
  • Investigations
National Security News
  • Home
  • Ukraine War
  • Russia
  • Israel
  • Iran
  • Africa
  • Tech
  • Investigations
Home»Iran
Iran

Putin’s Nuclear Gift? Russia reportedly transfers submarine reactors to North Korea

News RoomBy News RoomSeptember 19, 20250 ViewsNo Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

🌐 Translate Article

Translating...

📖 Read Along

💬 AI Assistant

🤖
Hi! I'm here to help you understand this article. Ask me anything about the content!

By Isabella Egerton

South Korea’s military is investigating reports that Russia has delivered nuclear submarine reactor modules to North Korea — a transfer that, if confirmed, would represent one of the most serious acts of nuclear proliferation in recent decades.

According to South Korean officials cited by the Korea JoongAng Daily, Moscow shipped two to three nuclear propulsion modules to Pyongyang earlier this year. The modules — reportedly removed from decommissioned Russian submarines — include a reactor, turbine, and cooling system, the critical elements needed to power a nuclear submarine.

The alleged transfer coincided with North Korean state media photographs released in March showing Kim Jong-un touring a shipyard to inspect the regime’s first nuclear-powered submarine. Analysts estimated the vessel under construction could weigh around 7,000 tons and carry up to ten ballistic missiles in vertical launch tubes.

A strategic leap

If substantiated, the handover would mark a dramatic acceleration of North Korea’s naval nuclear ambitions. Nuclear propulsion would allow Pyongyang’s submarines to remain submerged for extended periods, travel far beyond regional waters, and deploy ballistic missiles with global reach. 

These capabilities would make North Korea’s nuclear forces much harder to neutralise in a first strike, while ensuring the regime retains a credible retaliatory capability in the event of nuclear war. Operating underwater, the submarines could move undetected by satellite surveillance, giving Pyongyang unprecedented freedom to position and launch weapons.

A quid pro quo

The reactors are widely viewed as payment for Pyongyang’s deepening military support to Russia in its war against Ukraine. Since October 2024, intelligence assessments suggest at least 12,000 North Korean troops have fought alongside Russian forces, with Kyiv warning that up to 30,000 more could follow. Western officials estimate that hundreds have already been killed in combat. In addition, Pyongyang has supplied artillery shells, rockets, and other munitions to Russia.

Moscow’s provision of nuclear propulsion technology — even from retired platforms — would not only breach longstanding United Nations Security Council resolutions but also run counter to the spirit of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Western governments have repeatedly warned that Russia’s reliance on North Korea for manpower and weapons risks eroding global non-proliferation norms.

Reverse engineering risks

Beyond the immediate transfer, access to working propulsion modules could enable North Korean scientists to reverse-engineer the technology, drastically reducing the time required to field a domestically developed nuclear submarine. The long-term implication is not simply one submarine but a potential programme — a fleet of nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) that could fundamentally alter deterrence dynamics in Asia and beyond.

International repercussions

So far, Seoul has stopped short of publicly confirming the transfer, stating only that it has intelligence pointing to the delivery and is “verifying the facts.” The United States and its allies are expected to press the issue at the United Nations and the International Atomic Energy Agency if further evidence emerges.

Analysts warn that such a transfer would force Washington, Seoul, and Tokyo to accelerate their anti-submarine warfare capabilities, deepen trilateral maritime cooperation, and prepare for a scenario in which North Korea can threaten cities worldwide with sea-based nuclear weapons.

The bigger picture

Kim Jong-un’s ties with Vladimir Putin have deepened over the past year, marked by reciprocal visits and pledges of strategic cooperation. Just weeks ago, Kim was hosted in Beijing by Xi Jinping, reinforcing Pyongyang’s bid to exploit its partnerships with Moscow and Beijing to strengthen its hand against the West.

For Russia, desperate for manpower and munitions in Ukraine, the transfer may be a tolerable price. For North Korea, it could represent the long-sought breakthrough: a credible second-strike nuclear capability that would place Pyongyang in a new league of strategic powers.

News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

News Room is the editorial desk at National Security News. We cover breaking developments in geopolitics, defense, intelligence, and cybersecurity—publishing timely updates, explainers, and analysis from our reporting team and trusted contributors.

Keep Reading

Inside Iran’s IRGC: power, influence and losses in the 2026 war

US and Iran agree to provisional ceasefire as Tehran says it will reopen strait of Hormuz

Trump warns ‘a whole civilisation will die tonight’ ahead of Iran Strait of Hormuz deadline

Trump’s first address to the nation since US strikes on Iran

United States could leave NATO, says Trump, as he claims Iran ‘wants a ceasefire’

The other prize of Operation Epic Fury: a new deal for Iran’s minorities

Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Editors Picks

US and Iran agree to provisional ceasefire as Tehran says it will reopen strait of Hormuz

April 8, 2026

Trump warns ‘a whole civilisation will die tonight’ ahead of Iran Strait of Hormuz deadline

April 7, 2026

Trump’s first address to the nation since US strikes on Iran

April 2, 2026

United States could leave NATO, says Trump, as he claims Iran ‘wants a ceasefire’

April 2, 2026

The other prize of Operation Epic Fury: a new deal for Iran’s minorities

March 30, 2026

Latest Articles

Iran rejects United States President Donald Trump’s reported 15-point ceasefire plan as “excessive”

March 25, 2026

Iran paying petty criminal proxies to carry out attacks in UK

March 24, 2026

How MTN-Irancell enabled the IRGC’s ICBM programme

March 24, 2026

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

Facebook X (Twitter) TikTok Instagram LinkedIn
© 2026 National Security News. All Rights Reserved.
  • About us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?