A new report uncovers that The Wire by Acutus, a site linked to OpenAI, is allegedly using AI agents to produce news and solicit expert comments, raising concerns over automated bias and industry influence in politics.
An investigative report from The Midas Project’s Model Republic has alleged that a little-known news site with apparent links to OpenAI is using AI agents to impersonate human reporters while gathering quotes from outside experts. The site, The Wire by Acutus, was launched on 29 December 2025 and appears to have no obvious human bylines, according to the Futurism account of the investigation.
Model Republic said its checks suggest the bulk of the site’s output is machine-made. Using the AI detector Pangram, it found that 97% of Acutus articles were either fully or partly generated by AI, while publicly accessible code reportedly included prompts and fields designed to feed background material to an AI writer and to suggest interview questions. The site’s RSS feed also appears to describe an automated editorial process in which only one of five steps is handled by a human, with a median turnaround time of 44 seconds.
The more unusual allegation is that Acutus is not just producing AI-written copy, but also deploying AI to solicit comments from real-world experts. Model Republic said it obtained an email sent to Nathan Calvin, vice-president and general counsel at the advocacy group Encode, from an address identifying the sender as a reporter named Michael Chen. A search turned up no evident human journalist by that name, and the message came from a generic Acutus email account. Code on the site reportedly also referred to an “AI interviewer” and a “reporter agent”.
The investigation further drew attention to possible political connections. According to Futurism, Acutus stories have been repeatedly promoted on X by Patrick Hynes, president of the Republican public relations firm Novus Public Affairs. Novus works for Targeted Victory, whose chief executive Zac Moffatt also co-founded the pro-AI super PAC Leading the Future. That committee, which has raised more than $125 million, is backed by OpenAI president Greg Brockman and other tech figures, and has said it wants to support candidates favouring AI-friendly policy.
The editorial line of some Acutus pieces has also raised eyebrows. One article criticised AI safety advocate and journalist John Sherman over remarks about data centres and contacted organisations listed as clients of his consulting business to ask whether they would continue working with him. Even if the suggested OpenAI connection remains circumstantial, the report argues that a publication apparently run by AI, while posing as a conventional newsroom and advancing industry-friendly arguments, marks a further escalation in a debate already fraught with concern over synthetic media, automated persuasion and the boundaries of newsroom automation.
Source Reference Map
Inspired by headline at: [1]
Sources by paragraph:
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
10
Notes:
The article was published on April 27, 2026, and is the earliest known publication of this specific content. No earlier versions or similar narratives were found, indicating high freshness. No recycled news or discrepancies were identified.
Quotes check
Score:
8
Notes:
The article includes direct quotes attributed to Nathan Calvin and Michael Chen. However, no independent verification of these quotes was found online, raising concerns about their authenticity. The absence of verifiable sources for these quotes reduces the score.
Source reliability
Score:
7
Notes:
The lead source, Futurism, is a reputable publication. However, the article heavily relies on a report from The Midas Project’s Model Republic, which is a relatively new and niche publication. The lack of a clear editorial team and transparency about the authorship of Model Republic raises questions about its reliability. Additionally, the article’s reliance on a single source for critical claims about Acutus and its practices reduces the overall reliability score.
Plausibility check
Score:
6
Notes:
The claims about Acutus using AI agents to impersonate human journalists and solicit expert comments are plausible but lack independent verification. The absence of corroborating reports from other reputable outlets and the reliance on a single source for these claims reduce the score. The article also raises concerns about potential political connections and biases, which are not independently verified.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): FAIL
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The article presents serious allegations about Acutus using AI agents to impersonate human journalists and solicit expert comments. However, these claims are primarily based on a single, relatively new, and niche publication, The Midas Project’s Model Republic, which lacks independent verification from other reputable sources. The absence of corroborating reports and the reliance on unverifiable quotes further diminish the article’s credibility. Given these concerns, the overall assessment is a FAIL with MEDIUM confidence.
Supercharge Your Content Strategy
Feel free to test this content on your social media sites to see whether it works for your community.
