Halifax, a subsidiary of Lloyds Banking Group, plans to close 100 branches across the UK by 2025 amid a rapid shift towards digital services, prompting concerns over access to cash and regulatory responses aimed at safeguarding community banking needs.
Halifax, a subsidiary of Lloyds Banking Group, is set to close a total of 100 branches across the UK by the end of 2025, continuing a wider trend of banking sector contraction of physical locations in favour of digital services. The majority of these closures have already taken place, with the next wave involving branches in Crewe, Stretford (Manchester), Sittingbourne, and Mold closing between October 14 and 16. In total, 54 closures have been confirmed, while a further 46 locations previously closed have undergone re-assessment by LINK, the organisation tasked with evaluating local access to cash services. LINK’s reviews typically result in recommendations for maintaining some cash access through banking hubs or ATMs, with any new services expected to be in place within 12 weeks after closure, assuming no existing coverage.
This programme forms part of Lloyds Banking Group’s broader initiative to close 136 branches nationwide between May 2025 and March 2026. This includes 61 Lloyds branches, 61 Halifax sites, and 14 Bank of Scotland branches. These decisions are driven by a sharp decline in in-branch transactions — with 10 million fewer transactions recorded in 2024 compared to the previous year — as more than 21 million customers increasingly prefer mobile and online banking options. The group has sought to reassure customers that no job losses will result from these closures; affected employees are being offered redeployment opportunities within the company.
Despite closures, Lloyds Banking Group emphasises that physical banking services remain accessible through alternative channels. Customers can visit any Lloyds, Halifax, or Bank of Scotland branch, utilise shared Banking Hubs, or conduct everyday banking at Post Office branches. Additionally, over 30,000 PayPoint locations allow cash deposits, offering some mitigation against the reduced branch footprint. These efforts reflect a broader shift within the UK banking sector, with other major banks such as NatWest, Barclays, Santander, and HSBC also reducing their number of branches amid changing consumer behaviours.
Regulators are increasingly responsive to concerns about the consequences of branch closures, particularly for vulnerable and rural communities reliant on cash access. From September 2024, new Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) rules require banks to delay branch closures until alternative free cash access is confirmed locally. This includes deployment of free ATMs or banking hubs, often based in post offices, to ensure communities are not left without essential financial services. Although 31 banking hubs have been opened in previously underserved towns with another 70 planned, there is widespread criticism that these measures have not kept pace with the scale of branch shutdowns.
Andrew Bailey, Governor of the Bank of England, has made public appeals amid growing concern about the social impact of these closures. The government faces pressure to strengthen regulatory powers to enforce more extensive provision of banking hubs and alternative services, safeguarding access to cash for millions. Labour has pledged to accelerate the opening of additional banking hubs over the next five years to tackle the gaps left by branch withdrawals.
In summary, Halifax’s branch closures exemplify a significant transformation in UK retail banking driven by digital adoption, regulatory changes, and evolving consumer preferences. While customers benefit from more convenient digital tools and shared access points such as banking hubs and the Post Office, the ongoing reduction of physical branches continues to raise important questions about financial inclusion and equitable access for all communities.
📌 Reference Map:
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative reports on Halifax’s plan to close 100 bank branches by the end of 2025. This aligns with Lloyds Banking Group’s earlier announcement in January 2025 about closing 136 branches, including 61 Halifax sites, between May 2025 and March 2026. ([reuters.com](https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/lloyds-close-136-branches-uk-ft-reports-2025-01-29/?utm_source=openai)) The specific closure dates for the branches mentioned in the narrative (Crewe, Stretford, Sittingbourne, and Mold) are not found in the provided sources, suggesting the information may be original. However, the narrative’s reliance on a single source (Express.co.uk) raises concerns about potential bias and accuracy. Additionally, the Express.co.uk website is currently inaccessible due to a robots.txt restriction, limiting the ability to verify the content directly.
Quotes check
Score:
7
Notes:
The narrative includes direct quotes attributed to Lloyds Banking Group and Andrew Bailey, Governor of the Bank of England. However, these quotes are not found in the provided sources, indicating they may be original or exclusive. The absence of these quotes in other reputable outlets raises questions about their authenticity and the narrative’s overall credibility.
Source reliability
Score:
5
Notes:
The narrative originates from Express.co.uk, a publication known for sensationalist reporting. The website is currently inaccessible due to a robots.txt restriction, preventing direct verification of the content. The reliance on a single, potentially biased source diminishes the overall reliability of the narrative.
Plausability check
Score:
6
Notes:
The narrative’s claims about Halifax’s branch closures are plausible, given the broader trend of bank closures in the UK. However, the lack of corroboration from other reputable sources and the absence of specific closure dates for the mentioned branches raise concerns about the narrative’s accuracy and completeness.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): FAIL
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The narrative presents plausible information about Halifax’s planned branch closures but relies on a single, potentially biased source with limited verification. The absence of corroboration from other reputable outlets and the inaccessibility of the source website due to a robots.txt restriction further undermine the narrative’s credibility. The lack of specific closure dates for the mentioned branches raises additional concerns about the accuracy and completeness of the information.

