The City of London Law Society and Law Society of England and Wales have issued stark warnings to the UK government, cautioning that recent proposals to increase taxes on LLPs threaten the sector’s stability and the UK’s position as a global legal hub.
The City of London Law Society (CLLS) has publicly warned Chancellor Rachel Reeves against rushing ahead with plans to scrap tax advantages for Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs), including the proposed National Insurance contributions (NICs) for LLP partners. In a blunt letter to the Treasury, the CLLS emphasized that such unilateral changes, pushed through without meaningful consultation, threaten to destabilize a vital sector that underpins the UK’s standing as a global legal powerhouse. Colin Passmore, the CLLS chair and former senior partner at Simmons & Simmons, urged the government to pause and engage in genuine dialogue, warning that these measures risk undermining the City’s competitive edge and the resilience of its legal services industry.
This sector, responsible for over £57 billion in gross value added annually and supporting half a million jobs, is a linchpin of the UK economy. Yet, the proposed reforms threaten to upend its foundations. The legal community made clear that the current LLP model, often mischaracterized as offering tax breaks, merely recognizes that partners are self-employed and thus face a different NIC regime—paying lower NICs on some profits and avoiding employer NICs altogether. Imposing a new NIC burden specifically on LLP partners risks creating an uneven and punitive tax environment—an unwarranted attack on a sector that has long been a global leader. Such misguided policies could erode the City’s reputation as a secure hub for international legal excellence and deter future investment.
The Law Society of England and Wales has echoed these serious concerns. Vice President Brett Dixon warned that any tax hikes on LLPs would threaten the UK’s competitive edge precisely when the sector is burdened with increasing regulatory constraints, from anti-money laundering reforms to tighter regulation of legal and tax advisers. He warned that many legal aid firms, operating as LLPs with razor-thin margins, could face devastating financial pressure—potentially reducing legal aid provision at a time when access to justice should be expanding, not contracting. Moreover, the Society fears that the proposed policies could give an unfair advantage to US law firms and international competitors, who would suffer fewer financial burdens, further undermining the UK’s legal industry.
Beyond the legal sector, industry voices have warned that these policies could backfire across the economy. Andrew England, a business tax partner at Menzies, pointed out that the new ‘partnership NICs’ amount to a form of tax double-whammy, hitting overtaxed profits above existing income tax and NICs. Many professional services—law, dentistry, accounting—are structured as partnerships, and increased costs could lead firms to pass these on to clients through higher fees or to employees via lower remuneration. Such measures threaten to stifle innovation, slow recruitment, and damage growth—just as the sector most critical to UK’s economic recovery is struggling to adapt. England emphasized that penalizing partners who risk their own capital discourages reinvestment and expansion—exactly the opposite of what Britain needs in its post-Brexit landscape.
Leaders within the legal field are united in their call for meaningful, open consultation before any further reform. Last year’s warnings about the dangers of piecemeal tax legislation remain unheeded, and this new push risks issuing a death knell to Britain’s legal reputation. The Society has urged the Treasury to clarify and simplify partnership tax rules to prevent disincentives that could suppress innovation and investment—key ingredients for future growth.
In addition, the Law Society has called on the government to extend tax reliefs such as ‘full expensing’ to legal firms structured as partnerships, which currently miss out because their partners are taxed individually and not subject to corporation tax. Such reforms would encourage tech adoption, infrastructure investment, and long-term growth in a sector that generates around £60 billion annually—despite the relentless assault from increasing fiscal and regulatory pressures.
The legal fraternity’s broader alarm bells also include opposition to new levies aimed at combating economic crime. The Law Society considers these levies an unwarranted ‘special tax’ on the legal sector—yet another financial burden that threatens to make Britain less attractive for international investment. With firms already dedicating substantial resources to anti-money laundering and compliance efforts, these additional costs risk making the UK’s legal environment even less welcoming, undermining efforts to position London as the global legal capital.
Ultimately, the message from the sector is clear: these proposed reforms threaten to curtail growth, diminish the sector’s global competitiveness, and weaken the UK’s standing as an international legal hub. Instead of reckless, ill-considered tax hikes, the government should prioritize constructive engagement, recognizing the legal sector’s vital contribution to the economy and the vital importance of maintaining stability in these uncertain times. As the UK attempts to rebuild post-election, any measures that risk undermining the City’s financial and legal excellence are a step in the wrong direction—one that could have lasting, damaging consequences.
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
9
Notes:
The narrative is current, with the latest publication date being 4 November 2025. The City of London Law Society’s letter to Chancellor Rachel Reeves was published on the same date. No earlier versions of this specific content were found, indicating originality. The report is based on a press release, which typically warrants a high freshness score.
Quotes check
Score:
9
Notes:
The direct quotes from Colin Passmore and Brett Dixon appear to be original, with no earlier matches found online. This suggests the content is potentially exclusive.
Source reliability
Score:
10
Notes:
The narrative originates from the Law Society Gazette, a reputable publication known for its coverage of legal industry news. This enhances the credibility of the information presented.
Plausability check
Score:
9
Notes:
The claims regarding the potential impact of National Insurance contributions on Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs) are consistent with recent discussions in the legal sector. Similar concerns have been reported by other reputable outlets, such as Reuters. The language and tone are appropriate for the topic and region, and the report includes specific factual anchors, including names, institutions, and dates.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The narrative is current and original, with direct quotes appearing to be exclusive. The source is reputable, and the claims made are plausible and consistent with other reputable outlets. No significant credibility risks were identified.
