Listen to the article
The Air Force is sweeping some of the offices that oversee its acquisition programs into groups with similar missions, part of an effort that aligns with—but also predates—recent acquisition-reform guidance issued by the defense secretary.
On Thursday, service officials revealed the first five of the new groups and the “portfolio acquisition executives” who will run them:
Ostensibly, these new PAEs replace and supersede program executive officers who were focused on narrower efforts. But most of the uniformed and civilian PAEs were already running acquisition efforts focused on sets of related missions rather than individual programs.
The new roles were seen as a key part of Hegseth’s November speech and memo to overhaul the existing defense industrial base and encourage faster acquisitions.
While some defense experts have praised the PAE model, one former defense official said the Air Force already had many of its portfolios more broadly focused on mission sets.
“From the Air Force perspective, they were pretty well aligned with mission sets to begin with,” the former official told Defense One. “Good things are happening here, but for the Air Force it’s more of a continuation of work that’s been going on for some time.”
The Space Force will also have two PAEs to oversee acquisitions related to space access and space-based sensing and targeting missions, according to a department news release. An Air Force spokesperson did not respond with the names of the new space-related PAEs by publication time.
“This transformation is a generational opportunity for the Department of the Air Force,” Air Force Secretary Troy Meink said in the news release. “It enables us to holistically reform our enterprise—from requirements, to acquisition, to test—in order to support the rapid and efficient development of our warfighting capabilities in order to get the operators what they need when they need it.”
But many of the service’s marquee acquisition programs now have been taken over by the Office of the Secretary of Defense. Weeks after Hegseth’s speech, the Pentagon took over oversight of the Air Force’s biggest and costliest programs, sweeping them into a “Direct Reporting Portfolio Manager for Critical Major Weapons Systems.” Air Force Lt. Gen. Dale White was nominated to the role, which oversees programs such as the Sentinel and Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles, the B-21 bomber, the F-47 fighter jet, and the VC-25B presidential aircraft.
Read the full article here
17 Comments
The fact that the Air Force is making changes to its acquisition processes to get ‘the operators what they need when they need it’ suggests that the service is prioritizing the needs of its warfighters, which is a positive development.
The fact that the Pentagon has swept the Air Force’s marquee acquisition programs into a single portfolio manager raises questions about the potential impact on the service’s ability to develop and acquire new capabilities quickly and efficiently.
The statement that ‘good things are happening here, but for the Air Force it’s more of a continuation of work that’s been going on for some time’ from a former defense official suggests that the service has been making progress in its acquisition reform efforts, even if it’s not entirely new.
It’s interesting to see that the Air Force is focusing on supporting the ‘rapid and efficient development of our warfighting capabilities’ as part of its acquisition reform efforts, which could have significant implications for the service’s ability to respond to emerging threats.
The mention of the F-47 fighter jet as one of the programs overseen by the Direct Reporting Portfolio Manager for Critical Major Weapons Systems caught my attention, as I wasn’t aware that this program was still active.
The Air Force’s decision to consolidate acquisition program offices into mission-focused groups seems like a step in the right direction, especially with the new roles of portfolio acquisition executives who will oversee related missions rather than individual programs.
It’s worth noting that the Air Force’s acquisition reform efforts predate the recent guidance issued by the defense secretary, which suggests that the service has been proactive in addressing its acquisition challenges.
I’d like to know more about how the new PAEs will work with the existing program executive officers and how this change will affect the overall acquisition process.
I’m concerned that the consolidation of acquisition program offices into mission-focused groups could lead to a loss of expertise and knowledge in specific areas, particularly if personnel are reassigned or let go.
I’m skeptical about the effectiveness of the new PAE model, given that a former defense official stated that the Air Force already had many of its portfolios more broadly focused on mission sets, making this change seem like more of a continuation of existing work.
The nomination of Air Force Lt. Gen. Dale White to the role of Direct Reporting Portfolio Manager for Critical Major Weapons Systems is a notable move, and I’d like to know more about his experience and qualifications for this position.
I’m curious to know more about the Space Force’s two PAEs and how they will oversee acquisitions related to space access and space-based sensing and targeting missions, as mentioned in the department news release.
It will be interesting to see how the Space Force’s PAEs will work together with the Air Force’s PAEs to achieve their mission objectives.
Air Force Secretary Troy Meink’s statement that this transformation is a ‘generational opportunity’ for the Department of the Air Force suggests that the service is committed to making significant changes to its acquisition processes.
I’d like to know more about how the new PAE model will affect the relationships between the Air Force and its industry partners, and whether this change will lead to more efficient or effective collaborations.
The fact that the Air Force is trying to ‘holistically reform our enterprise—from requirements, to acquisition, to test’ suggests that the service recognizes the need for a more integrated approach to acquisition and development.
The fact that the Office of the Secretary of Defense has taken over oversight of the Air Force’s biggest and costliest programs, including the Sentinel and Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles, is a significant development that warrants closer examination.