Teen Vogue is merging with Vogue.com, a major shift that will see its editor-in-chief, Versha Sharma, depart after less than two years in the role.
The move is part of Condé Nast’s broader effort to streamline operations and extend Vogue’s digital reach, particularly among younger readers who have become crucial to the brand’s growth online.
Chloe Malle, Vogue’s head of editorial content, will oversee both Vogue and Teen Vogue. She said she plans to preserve Teen Vogue’s distinctive voice while aligning it more closely with Vogue’s broader digital strategy. Malle described herself as a long-time admirer of the title and said she was eager to champion its focus on youth culture and activism.
Teen Vogue will continue under its own name, concentrating on career development, cultural leadership and issues important to young audiences. Condé Nast says readers under 35 now make up more than half of Vogue’s social media and YouTube following.
Anna Wintour, Condé Nast’s global chief content officer and Vogue’s editorial director, praised Sharma’s leadership during a period of transition, highlighting her role in expanding the Teen Vogue Summit and strengthening the brand’s editorial impact.
But the reorganisation has come at a cost. Teen Vogue’s news and politics editor, Lex McMenamin, confirmed on social media that several political staffers had been laid off, leaving no political editors at the publication. Former Teen Vogue journalist Emily Bloch criticised the timing of the cuts – just a day before the New York mayoral election – as damaging to a publication known for its political engagement.
The merger follows similar consolidations at Condé Nast, including the integration of Vogue Business into Vogue’s main platform in October. The company says the changes will create a more unified and accessible experience for readers across its brands.
Sharma, who became Teen Vogue’s editor-in-chief in May 2023 after working at NowThis, had pledged to lead with empathy, accountability and optimism. Her departure marks another step in Teen Vogue’s transformation from a standalone digital magazine into part of the wider Vogue ecosystem.
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
10
Notes:
The narrative is fresh, with the earliest known publication date being November 3, 2025. The report is based on a press release from Condé Nast, which typically warrants a high freshness score. No discrepancies in figures, dates, or quotes were found. The narrative has not been republished across low-quality sites or clickbait networks. No earlier versions show different figures, dates, or quotes. The article includes updated data and does not recycle older material.
Quotes check
Score:
10
Notes:
The quotes from Chloe Malle and Anna Wintour are unique to this report, with no identical matches found in earlier material. No variations in quote wording were noted. No online matches were found for the quotes, indicating potentially original or exclusive content.
Source reliability
Score:
10
Notes:
The narrative originates from TheWrap, a reputable entertainment news outlet. The report is based on a press release from Condé Nast, a reputable organisation. The individuals mentioned, including Versha Sharma, Chloe Malle, and Anna Wintour, are verifiable and have public profiles.
Plausability check
Score:
10
Notes:
The claims about Teen Vogue merging with Vogue.com and Versha Sharma’s departure are corroborated by multiple reputable sources, including Vogue’s official announcement. The timing of the layoffs, including the departure of Lex McMenamin, aligns with the reported restructuring. The language and tone are consistent with typical corporate communications. The structure focuses on relevant details without excessive or off-topic information.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The narrative is fresh, original, and supported by reputable sources. The claims are plausible and corroborated by multiple outlets. No significant credibility risks were identified.

