Generating key takeaways...
The Enabling Better Infrastructure programme by the Institution of Civil Engineers seeks to provide governments worldwide with strategic guidance to overcome resistance and ensure resilient, long-term infrastructure development aligned with sustainability goals.
Planning and delivering infrastructure that meets long-term national goals remains a significant challenge for governments worldwide. In the UK, for instance, the urgent demand for renewable energy to achieve net zero targets is often met with public opposition, visible in protests against solar and wind infrastructure. Similar resistance has been observed in countries such as Spain, Italy, and Poland. This resistance is compounded by fragmented government approaches, where political changes can result in the scrapping of important infrastructure initiatives, leading to inconsistent progress. Against this backdrop, the Enabling Better Infrastructure (EBI) programme, led by the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE), offers updated strategic guidance aimed at helping governments align their infrastructure projects with sustainable, long-term outcomes.
The EBI programme has emerged from extensive global engagement, involving 26 countries, including New Zealand, Peru, and Indonesia. It focuses on sharing lessons in strategic infrastructure planning to support governments in navigating complex, evolving needs. The programme’s updated guidance incorporates these experiences, providing a framework to help governments decide what to build, why, and in what order. This includes assessing options, such as choosing between hard engineering solutions like sea walls and softer, nature-based alternatives for coastal resilience. Recognising resource constraints, the guidance assists governments in prioritising infrastructure that delivers the greatest overall value, linking projects to broader goals such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals.
A critical feature of the EBI guidance is its emphasis on stakeholder engagement. The programme encourages early and broad consultation, involving private sectors, development banks, community groups, and academic institutions to identify bottlenecks and ensure more equitable outcomes. For example, New Zealand’s inclusion of Māori communities in infrastructure planning addresses historical inequalities in access to essential services. Public engagement is also championed, with the UK demonstrating that nearly 70% of the public favour discussions that focus on the positive benefits of infrastructure projects rather than costs. The programme highlights international examples, like the Netherlands, where public input has directly shaped national infrastructure priorities, ultimately fostering greater acceptance and resilience in planning.
Political cycles often pose challenges to long-term infrastructure delivery, as priorities shift with changing governments. The EBI programme offers guidance to build consensus across political divides, helping to insulate key projects from partisan disruption. Saint Lucia’s approach of consulting opposition parties during its 25-to-50-year infrastructure planning exemplifies this, ensuring continuity despite leadership changes. Additionally, EBI supports governments in addressing practical delivery questions, such as financing, sequencing projects, and workforce training. This comprehensive focus aims to enhance the likelihood that strategic plans are implemented successfully over time.
The ICE continues to position the EBI programme as a vital mechanism for shaping resilient and sustainable infrastructure globally. As ICE President Professor Anusha Shah articulated during the programme’s launch event at a gathering in Singapore, strategic forward planning is essential for meeting climate and economic objectives. The ICE’s collaboration with governments, including recent partnership agreements such as the one with Peru’s Ministry of Economy and Finance, underscores the growing recognition of the value of EBI’s approach. While challenges remain, the programme’s iterative development, peer learning, and inclusive stakeholder engagement have made important strides toward infrastructure planning that is built to last.
📌 Reference Map:
- Paragraph 1 – [1], [2], [6]
- Paragraph 2 – [1], [4], [7]
- Paragraph 3 – [1], [4], [6]
- Paragraph 4 – [1], [3], [5]
- Paragraph 5 – [1], [3], [7]
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
10
Notes:
The narrative is based on a press release from the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE), dated 10 October 2025, announcing the updated Enabling Better Infrastructure (EBI) guidance. This indicates high freshness. The EBI programme has been active since 2019, with previous updates in January 2024. ([ice.org.uk](https://www.ice.org.uk/news-insight/media-centre/press-releases-list/enabling-better-infrastructure-ice-led-guidance-for-governments-updated?utm_source=openai)) The most recent update in October 2025 suggests ongoing development and relevance.
Quotes check
Score:
10
Notes:
The narrative includes direct quotes from ICE President Professor Anusha Shah and Professor Jim Hall, Chair of the EBI steering group. These quotes are unique to this release, with no identical matches found in earlier material, indicating original content.
Source reliability
Score:
10
Notes:
The narrative originates from the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE), a reputable organisation with a longstanding history in civil engineering and infrastructure planning. This enhances the credibility of the information presented.
Plausability check
Score:
10
Notes:
The claims about the EBI programme’s updates and its global engagement are consistent with previous reports and align with known activities of the ICE. The narrative’s language and tone are formal and consistent with official communications from the ICE, further supporting its plausibility.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The narrative is a recent, original press release from the reputable Institution of Civil Engineers, detailing the latest updates to the Enabling Better Infrastructure programme. The information is consistent with known activities of the ICE, and the quotes are unique to this release, indicating high credibility.
