Concerns mount over safety risks in unregulated private baby scan clinics

Leading radiographers warn that unqualified operators in private clinics pose serious health risks to mothers and babies, calling for stricter regulation and registered sonographer titles amid alarming misdiagnoses and safety failures.

Leading radiographers have raised serious concerns about the safety of high street clinics offering baby scans without qualified specialists, warning that these services may put both mothers and babies at risk. The Society of Radiographers (SoR) has highlighted a surge in such clinics where anyone with an ultrasound machine can claim to be a sonographer, despite lacking professional qualifications or registration. This situation has led to alarming cases of misdiagnosis, including instances where babies were wrongly declared deceased and life-threatening conditions like ectopic pregnancies were missed.

The SoR has called for sonographers to have a “protected” job title, meaning only those with appropriate qualifications and registered with a regulatory body would be allowed to use it. Katie Thompson, SoR president and a hospital sonographer, explained that patients commonly assume their scans are conducted by trained professionals, but currently, there is no legal restriction preventing untrained individuals from operating ultrasound machines and providing diagnostic interpretations. Thompson stressed that registration would offer patients a clear route to raise complaints and hold practitioners accountable through regulatory oversight.

Several troubling examples illustrate the risks of unregulated private clinics. One mother was advised to have an induced miscarriage after a private sonographer misinterpreted a blood clot as a malformed foetus, while an NHS hospital subsequently confirmed a healthy pregnancy with a clear heartbeat. Another concern involves the failure to detect serious abnormalities during early private scans, only for them to be identified later during NHS 20-week scans, including conditions such as spina bifida and polycystic kidneys. The SoR also noted that outdated medical advice is sometimes given, such as recommending unnecessary prolonged bed rest based on incorrect cervical assessments.

Concerns extend beyond misdiagnoses. The SoR has highlighted cases where individuals banned from working in NHS hospitals have secured employment in private clinics, prompting fears about patient safety. Gill Harrison, the SoR’s professional officer for ultrasound, said many patients are shocked to learn that sonographers might have no relevant qualifications or could even have been removed from professional registers but still perform scans.

Supporting these concerns, the Care Quality Commission (CQC) has inspected private ultrasound clinics and found significant safety failures, including staff without proper training, incorrect reporting of miscarriages, failure to communicate health concerns to general practitioners, and inadequate infection control and safeguarding measures. A Yorkshire clinic, for example, was found to have given women false miscarriage diagnoses and incorrect baby gender information, leading to 29 required safety improvements after CQC intervention.

The Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB) has also emphasised the importance of standardised care pathways and qualified professionals conducting pregnancy scans to avoid missed diagnoses of ectopic pregnancies, which pose serious health risks. Their reports underline the variability in early pregnancy service provision and the urgent need for systematic risk management in ultrasound diagnostics.

In response to these issues, the Department of Health and Social Care stated a commitment to appropriate regulation to help ensure patient safety. They acknowledged the trauma caused by incorrect diagnoses and said regulation of healthcare professionals is continuously reviewed to keep patient safety paramount. They are considering proposals from professional bodies, including the SoR, for protected sonographer titles and enhanced oversight of private clinics.

Additionally, the SoR has cautioned private clinics over advertising practices that may be misleading or fail to fully inform patients about the limitations and risks of early pregnancy scans, urging greater transparency to secure informed consent and maintain trust.

These findings indicate that while private baby scan clinics offer convenience and earlier glimpses into pregnancy, the lack of consistent regulation and qualified oversight poses potentially serious risks for expectant mothers and their unborn children. Health experts and regulators stress the importance of verifying qualifications and exercising caution when seeking private ultrasound services, as well as strengthening protections to ensure safety and accuracy in prenatal care.

📌 Reference Map:

• Paragraph 1 – ^[1] (The Independent), ^[2] (Evening Standard)
• Paragraph 2 – ^[1] (The Independent), ^[3] (The Irish News)
• Paragraph 3 – ^[1] (The Independent), ^[6] (Yorkshire Post)
• Paragraph 4 – ^[1] (The Independent), ^[3] (The Irish News)
• Paragraph 5 – ^[1] (The Independent)
• Paragraph 6 – ^[6] (Yorkshire Post), ^[7] (Osbornes Law)
• Paragraph 7 – ^[4] (HSIB report)
• Paragraph 8 – ^[1] (The Independent), ^[2] (Evening Standard), ^[3] (The Irish News)
• Paragraph 9 – ^[5] (SoR warning on advertising), ^[1] (The Independent)
• Paragraph 10 – ^[1] (The Independent), ^[7] (Osbornes Law)

Source: Noah Wire Services

Noah Fact Check Pro

The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.

Freshness check

Score:
8

Notes:
The narrative is recent, published on 3 November 2025. Similar concerns have been raised in the past, such as the Society of Radiographers’ guidance from October 2022 on ultrasound practice in private baby scan clinics ([sor.org](https://www.sor.org/getmedia/68635988-565a-45a8-8b57-53b29e8f651d/Competencies-for-ultrasound-practice-in-private-baby-scan-clinics_V2_D1-3?utm_source=openai)). However, the current report provides updated instances and details, indicating a high freshness score.

Quotes check

Score:
7

Notes:
Direct quotes from the Society of Radiographers and other professionals are used. While the exact wording matches previous statements, the inclusion of new examples and context suggests a moderate level of originality.

Source reliability

Score:
9

Notes:
The narrative originates from The Independent, a reputable UK news outlet. The Society of Radiographers, a professional body, is also cited, enhancing the credibility of the information.

Plausability check

Score:
8

Notes:
The claims about misdiagnoses and safety concerns in private baby scan clinics are plausible and align with previous reports, such as the BBC investigation from November 2020 ([tommys.org](https://www.tommys.org/pregnancy-information/news-and-blogs/bbc-investigation-shows-poor-practice-private-baby-scan-industry?utm_source=openai)). The inclusion of specific examples and references to regulatory bodies adds credibility.

Overall assessment

Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS

Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH

Summary:
The narrative is recent and provides updated information on safety concerns in private baby scan clinics, supported by credible sources and specific examples.