Australia’s world-first ban on social media accounts for under-16s came into force on 10 December 2025, requiring major platforms to remove existing accounts held by younger users and block new registrations. But early signs show how quickly the policy is running into technical and human obstacles.
Children have been able to evade checks within minutes by using parents’ accounts, older siblings, VPNs, fake identities or basic disguises. Thirteen-year-old Isobel told the BBC she bypassed Snapchat’s checks in under five minutes by using a photo of her mother; she said she could still access Snapchat even after being removed from TikTok.
Other young users described uploading non-human images, including one case involving a golden retriever, or sharing adult IDs to satisfy verification prompts. Reddit threads have filled with tips on mesh masks, makeup and other tricks to appear older.
Experts say these gaps are unsurprising. “They may try to alter their appearance to try to trick facial scanning age estimation,” said Lisa Given, professor of information sciences at RMIT University. “Or they may have a sibling, parent or another person over 16 do the facial scan for them to get past the age checks.”
Given added that facial-scanning tools carry an error margin of “one to three years,” making it possible for a 14-year-old to be misclassified as 17.
Tests cited by ABC News show how easily age-estimation systems can be fooled. Inexpensive masks and party disguises, including a $22 old man mask and a Guy Fawkes mask, were enough to mislead commonly used tools. Cyber-safety experts warn that verification prompts could also open the door to scammers who may use prove-your-age ruses to extract sensitive data.
The eSafety Commissioner’s guidance outlines what platforms may demand. Services can use facial analysis, account data or ID documents, but the Social Media Minimum Age legislation forbids forcing Australians to provide a government ID or to use an accredited digital ID service. Platforms must offer reasonable alternatives so people aged 16 or over are not locked out for refusing to supply government ID.
Technical proposals range from IP blacklisting to deeper network inspection and cross-referencing device signals, but all carry trade-offs. Heavy approaches such as deep packet inspection or broad IP blocking risk harming adults’ privacy and legitimate access and can still be bypassed with VPNs. Security specialists warn that younger users may turn to low-quality VPNs that expose them to malware or data theft.
The government casts the ban as a public-health intervention aimed at reducing harms linked to bullying, misinformation and body-image pressure. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has called it a cultural shift and urged young people to explore offline activities over the summer.
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
10
Notes:
The narrative is fresh, published on 10 December 2025, coinciding with the enforcement of Australia’s social media ban for under-16s. No earlier versions or recycled content were found. The report provides new insights into how teens are circumventing the ban, including using parents’ accounts, VPNs, fake IDs, and alternative verification methods.
Quotes check
Score:
10
Notes:
Direct quotes from individuals, such as 13-year-old Isobel, are unique to this report. No identical quotes were found in earlier material, indicating original content.
Source reliability
Score:
8
Notes:
NDTV is a reputable news organisation. However, the report includes anecdotal accounts from individuals, which are difficult to independently verify. The narrative also references reports from other outlets, such as The Washington Post and the BBC, which adds credibility.
Plausability check
Score:
9
Notes:
The claims about teens circumventing the social media ban using various methods are plausible and align with known challenges in enforcing age restrictions online. The report provides specific examples and expert opinions, enhancing its credibility.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The narrative is fresh and original, providing unique insights into how Australian teens are circumventing the new social media ban. While some anecdotal accounts are difficult to independently verify, the overall content is plausible and supported by expert opinions, leading to a high confidence in the assessment.
Supercharge Your Content Strategy
Feel free to test this content on your social media sites to see whether it works for your community.
