Ofcom fines Itai Tech £50,000 over AI nudification site’s age verification failure

UK regulator Ofcom has imposed a £50,000 fine on Itai Tech Ltd for failing to implement adequate age checks on its AI-powered nudification website, as part of a wider crackdown on online child protection and regulation of adult content platforms.

Ofcom, the UK’s internet and communications regulator, has fined Itai Tech Ltd £50,000 for failing to implement adequate age verification measures on its nudification website, Undress.cc. The site uses artificial intelligence to digitally remove clothing from images, effectively creating nude representations of the subjects. This fine is part of Ofcom’s broader enforcement efforts under the Online Safety Act, aimed at protecting children from harmful pornographic content online. Alongside the primary fine, Itai Tech received an additional £5,000 penalty for failing to comply with a statutory information request during the regulator’s investigation.

The fine reflects Ofcom’s assessment that Itai Tech did not meet its obligations under the law to verify that users accessing pornographic content are over 18. The penalty also took into account the fact that Itai Tech restricted access to UK users shortly after the investigation began, an action seen as a mitigating factor. Ofcom emphasised that the use of “highly effective age assurance” is non-negotiable in preventing children’s exposure to harmful content, and enforcement will be robust against failures to comply.

This action against Itai Tech forms part of a wider crackdown, with Ofcom revealing ongoing investigations into five companies operating a total of 20 pornography sites for similar lapses in age verification. These companies include providers of sites such as xxbrits, porntrex, fapello.com, and hqporner.com. Ofcom has made clear that it expects all providers of adult content accessible in the UK to adopt stringent age-checking processes or face significant fines and other enforcement measures.

The regulatory crackdown also includes the notable £20,000 fine imposed on the US-based imageboard 4chan Community Support LLC earlier this month. 4chan was penalised for failing to comply with Ofcom’s requests for documentation related to its risk assessment of illegal content. The penalty marks the first fine under the Online Safety Act and comes with a daily penalty regime should the site continue to fail to meet its statutory information obligations. Further non-compliance could result in blocked access to the site within the UK.

The enforcement against 4chan and other overseas platforms, including a recent lawsuit filed by 4chan and Kiwi Farms in the US challenging Ofcom’s online safety demands on free speech grounds, illustrates the growing tensions between UK regulatory efforts and platforms based outside its jurisdiction. These forums argue that Ofcom’s measures infringe on First Amendment protections in the US, despite the overwhelming UK legal mandate to protect children and users from harmful online content.

Overall, Ofcom’s vigorous approach signals a clear message to operators of adult content sites: rigorous age verification standards and full regulatory cooperation are mandatory under the Online Safety Act. Failure to comply will result in substantial fines and possible access restrictions, reinforcing the UK government’s commitment to safer internet experiences, particularly for children.

📌 Reference Map:

• ^[1] (AOL) – Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4
• ^[2] (Ofcom Official) – Paragraphs 1, 2, 3
• ^[3] (Ofcom Official Investigation) – Paragraph 1, 2
• ^[4] (Ofcom Official – 4chan fine) – Paragraph 5
• ^[5] (The Independent) – Paragraphs 1, 3
• ^[6] (Reuters) – Paragraph 5, 6
• ^[7] (Reuters) – Paragraph 6

Source: Noah Wire Services

Noah Fact Check Pro

The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.

Freshness check

Score:
10

Notes:
The narrative is fresh, with the Ofcom fine announced on 20 November 2025. ([ofcom.org.uk](https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/ofcom-fines-nudification-site-50000-for-failing-to-introduce-age-checks?utm_source=openai))

Quotes check

Score:
10

Notes:
No direct quotes are present in the provided text, indicating original content.

Source reliability

Score:
10

Notes:
The narrative originates from reputable sources, including Ofcom’s official press release and The Independent. ([ofcom.org.uk](https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/ofcom-fines-nudification-site-50000-for-failing-to-introduce-age-checks?utm_source=openai))

Plausability check

Score:
10

Notes:
The claims are plausible and corroborated by multiple reputable sources. ([ofcom.org.uk](https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/ofcom-fines-nudification-site-50000-for-failing-to-introduce-age-checks?utm_source=openai))

Overall assessment

Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS

Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH

Summary:
The narrative is fresh, original, and sourced from reputable outlets, with claims that are plausible and corroborated by multiple sources.