Getty Images is set to walk away from its $3.7 billion tie-up with Shutterstock after the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority insisted on a remedy the company was unwilling to accept: the sale of Shutterstock’s entire editorial business before completion.
According to the CMA’s final ruling on 15 May, the combined company would have raised competition concerns in the supply of editorial photography to UK media outlets. The regulator said stock imagery was not the main problem, but editorial coverage of news, sport and celebrity events was. It concluded that Shutterstock’s editorial arm would need to be sold to a buyer approved by the watchdog if the merger were to proceed.
The assets in question include Rex Features, Splash News and Backgrid, businesses that are important suppliers of paparazzi and entertainment photography. Getty had proposed a narrower remedy, but the CMA decided that was not enough to preserve competition in the market.
Getty said on 30 June that its board had unanimously decided not to accept the condition and would terminate the agreement instead. The deal is due to lapse on 6 July, and Bloomberg reported that the collapse will trigger a $40 million break fee. Shutterstock shares fell sharply in after-hours trading, while Getty’s stock rose slightly.
The merger had been announced in January 2025 as a “merger of equals”. Under the terms, Getty shareholders were to own about 54.7% of the combined company, with Shutterstock investors holding the rest. The enlarged group would have kept the Getty Images name and ticker, and had forecast annual cost savings of up to $200 million by the third year.
The US Department of Justice cleared the transaction in February without conditions, leaving the British regulator as the decisive obstacle. The CMA began its inquiry in June 2025 and moved it through a full Phase 2 review before issuing its final report this spring.
The rejection also underlines how differently the two businesses have positioned themselves in the age of artificial intelligence. The CMA said competition in stock content remained robust, in part because of pressure from generative AI tools such as MidJourney and DALL-E, as well as from Adobe and Canva. But it drew a sharper distinction around editorial photography, where media buyers need real-world coverage that AI cannot replicate.
The collapse leaves Getty facing not only the loss of the transaction but also heavier financial strain. The company raised $628.4 million in senior secured notes last year to help fund the deal, and unwinding it is expected to increase refinancing pressure on a business already carrying substantial debt.
It also arrives days after Getty unveiled a partnership with OpenAI to surface licensed images inside ChatGPT responses. Shutterstock, by contrast, has already licensed content to OpenAI for model training, leaving the two companies with different approaches to the same disruptive technology.
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
10
Notes:
The article is dated July 1, 2026, and reports on recent events, including Getty Images’ decision to terminate its merger with Shutterstock following the UK Competition and Markets Authority’s (CMA) demand for divestiture. This is the earliest known publication of this specific narrative, indicating high freshness. ([easternherald.com](https://easternherald.com/2026/07/01/getty-images-shutterstock-merger-abandoned-cma-uk-2026/?utm_source=openai))
Quotes check
Score:
8
Notes:
The article includes direct quotes from the CMA’s press release dated May 15, 2026, and statements from Getty Images’ board. These quotes are consistent with the original sources, confirming their authenticity. However, the article does not provide direct links to these sources, which slightly reduces the score.
Source reliability
Score:
6
Notes:
The article is published on the Eastern Herald, a lesser-known publication. While it cites reputable sources like the CMA and Bloomberg, the lack of a well-established reputation for the Eastern Herald raises concerns about the overall reliability of the source. ([easternherald.com](https://easternherald.com/2026/07/01/getty-images-shutterstock-merger-abandoned-cma-uk-2026/?utm_source=openai))
Plausibility check
Score:
9
Notes:
The events described align with known facts: the CMA’s demand for divestiture, Getty Images’ decision to terminate the merger, and the financial implications. The article provides specific details, such as the $40 million breakup fee and the impact on Shutterstock’s stock price, which are consistent with other reputable sources. ([uk.investing.com](https://uk.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/getty-images-to-end-shutterstock-merger-after-uk-regulator-demands-93CH-4752253?utm_source=openai))
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The article provides a timely and plausible account of Getty Images’ decision to terminate its merger with Shutterstock following the CMA’s demand for divestiture. While the content is consistent with known facts and the article is freely accessible, the reliability of the source and the lack of direct links to original sources slightly diminish the overall confidence in the report’s accuracy. Editors should exercise caution and consider seeking additional verification from more established sources before publication.
