Billionaire Elon Musk has criticised the UK government for alleged attempts to censor his platform X amid mounting concerns over AI tools producing non-consensual sexualised images of women and children, prompting international outrage and regulatory scrutiny.
Billionaire Elon Musk has accused the UK government of seeking to curb free speech after British ministers escalated threats to block his platform X amid outrage over an AI image tool that has produced sexualised images of women and children without consent.
Speaking on X, Musk said opponents of his platform were using “any excuse for censorship” and called the government “fascist”,”adding “They just want to suppress free speech.” According to reports, Musk’s xAI initially defended the tool, Grok, by blaming “legacy media lies” before X restricted image-generation to paying subscribers. [1][2][4]
UK ministers have demanded the function that enables sexually harassing image creation be removed and warned that further inaction could lead to access being blocked for users in the UK. The Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, Liz Kendall, said ministers were considering a ban and expected regulator Ofcom to take action “within days not weeks”. She warned that the Online Safety Act includes backstop powers to block services that refuse to comply with the law. [1][4][6]
The Justice Secretary, David Lammy, told The Guardian he had raised “the horrendous, horrific situation in which this new technology is allowing deepfakes and the manipulation of images of women and children, which is just absolutely abhorrent”. He also discussed the matter with US Vice-President JD Vance, who, Lammy said, viewed the manipulations as “entirely unacceptable”. [1][2]
Regulators and campaigners say limits for paying subscribers do not solve the problem. Ofcom has contacted X and xAI to assess compliance with duties to protect UK users, and reports indicate thousands of women have been targeted by accounts using Grok to alter fully clothed photos into sexualised images and, in some cases, to produce images of minors. Critics have also accused ministers of failing to give Parliament clearer criminal protections against creation and sharing of intimate images. [3][4][6]
The response has been international. Ireland’s media regulator notified the European Commission that Grok was being used to create digitally undressed images of women and children for sharing on X. Australia’s prime minister described the use of generative AI to sexualise people without consent as “abhorrent” and pointed to his government’s recent measures on under-16s’ social media use. Other countries and regulators from Europe to Asia have condemned the reports, and at least one country has moved to block Grok access. [1][5][7]
X said it had limited the tool to subscribers after the backlash, but governments and rights groups continue to press for firmer technical and policy fixes and for accountability for harms caused by AI-enabled deepfakes. Industry and legal experts warn that a patchwork of national responses could prompt firms to change service availability by jurisdiction or to implement stricter verification and moderation measures. [4][3][6]
As scrutiny intensifies, ministers in London face pressure to show that the Online Safety Act and Ofcom’s regulatory powers can be enforced effectively against large, cross-border platforms, while X confronts the challenge of policing rapid misuse of generative AI without unduly restricting legitimate speech. [1][4][3]
##Reference Map:
- [1] (China Daily) – Paragraph 1, Paragraph 2, Paragraph 3, Paragraph 5, Paragraph 8
- [2] (The Guardian) – Paragraph 2, Paragraph 3
- [3] (The Guardian) – Paragraph 4, Paragraph 6, Paragraph 8
- [4] (The Guardian) – Paragraph 2, Paragraph 4, Paragraph 6, Paragraph 7
- [5] (CBS News) – Paragraph 5
- [6] (Sky) – Paragraph 2, Paragraph 4, Paragraph 6
- [7] (The Independent) – Paragraph 5
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
9
Notes:
The narrative is current, with the earliest known publication date being January 10, 2026. The report is based on recent events, including Elon Musk’s statements and UK government actions regarding the Grok AI tool. The content appears original, with no evidence of being recycled or republished across low-quality sites. The inclusion of updated data and recent quotes suggests a high freshness score.
Quotes check
Score:
8
Notes:
Direct quotes from Elon Musk and UK officials are present. The earliest known usage of these quotes aligns with the publication date of January 10, 2026. No identical quotes appear in earlier material, indicating originality. However, slight variations in wording compared to other reports were noted, which may suggest paraphrasing.
Source reliability
Score:
7
Notes:
The narrative originates from China Daily, a state-owned media outlet. While it is a reputable source, its state ownership may influence the framing of the report. The report includes references to other reputable outlets like The Guardian and Sky News, which adds credibility. However, the reliance on a single source for direct quotes from Elon Musk and UK officials may limit the diversity of perspectives.
Plausability check
Score:
9
Notes:
The claims made in the narrative are consistent with recent reports from other reputable outlets, such as The Guardian and Sky News. The language and tone are appropriate for the topic and region, with no inconsistencies noted. The narrative includes specific factual anchors, such as dates, names, and institutions, enhancing its credibility. There is no excessive or off-topic detail, and the tone is consistent with typical corporate or official language.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The narrative is current and original, with direct quotes from reputable sources. The source, China Daily, is a state-owned media outlet, which may influence the framing of the report. However, the content is consistent with reports from other reputable outlets, and the language and tone are appropriate. No significant credibility risks were identified.
