{"id":9344,"date":"2026-04-09T21:31:48","date_gmt":"2026-04-09T21:31:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sawahsolutions.com\/range\/the-pentagon-claims-we-control-the-sky-over-iran-experts-say-the-air-war-isnt-that-simple\/"},"modified":"2026-04-09T21:31:49","modified_gmt":"2026-04-09T21:31:49","slug":"the-pentagon-claims-we-control-the-sky-over-iran-experts-say-the-air-war-isnt-that-simple","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sawahsolutions.com\/range\/the-pentagon-claims-we-control-the-sky-over-iran-experts-say-the-air-war-isnt-that-simple\/","title":{"rendered":"The Pentagon claims \u2018we control the sky\u2019 over Iran. Experts say the air war isn\u2019t that simple."},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Updated: 4:41 p.m. ET.<\/em><\/p>\n

To President Trump and his defense secretary, the herculean rescue of two downed airmen in hostile territory was further proof that the U.S. military has full control of the skies over Iran.\u00a0<\/p>\n

But the actual situation remains complicated and dangerous, according to former military officials and defense experts who said painting a simple picture overlooks the weapons that downed the F-15E\u2014and that still hold vast swaths of airspace at risk.\u00a0<\/p>\n

On Easter Sunday, Trump said in a social media post that the daring recovery underscored that U.S. forces had \u201cachieved overwhelming Air Dominance and Superiority over the Iranian skies.\u201d The next day, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said much the same.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe control the skies. You see we flew for seven hours in daylight over Iran to get the first pilot, and we flew seven hours in the middle of the night to get the second and Iran did nothing about it,\u201d Hegseth said Monday at a White House press conference.<\/p>\n

But airpower experts, including Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine, have been more measured. At press conferences, the former F-16 pilot has declared that air superiority exists over only certain areas of Iran; on Wednesday, he acknowledged the ongoing dangers that aviators face.\u00a0<\/p>\n

“I’ve laid out the statistics, but it does not truly capture the nature of combat. This is gritty and unforgiving business,” Caine said. “It’s chaotic, it’s hot, it’s dark, it’s unpredictable and there’s always unknowns.”<\/p>\n

Air superiority<\/em> is defined in Air Force doctrine as \u201cthe control of the air by one force that permits the conduct of its operations at a given time and place\u201d without severe enemy action that would result in mission failure. A higher level of control, air supremacy<\/em>, is established when the \u201copposing force is incapable of effective interference,\u201d but this \u201cmay be difficult to achieve in a peer or near-peer conflict.\u201d A state of air superiority or supremacy may be limited to a certain time, location, or altitude.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cControl of the skies\u201d and \u201cair dominance,\u201d on the other hand, have no formal meaning.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cI understand why people use it, but, from a doctrinal perspective, to say you \u2018control the sky\u2019 doesn’t really say anything, because control of the air is a spectrum,\u201d said Kelly Greico, a senior fellow at the Stimson Center. \u201cWhen President Trump and Secretary Hegseth are using these terms, they’re not necessarily using them the doctrinal way, the way that you see Gen. Caine using them.\u201d<\/p>\n

Trump\u2019s use of \u201cair dominance\u201d really \u201cdoesn’t mean anything,\u201d Greico said, and added it\u2019s not a term used in the Air Force\u2019s doctrine.<\/p>\n

In a statement, Pentagon spokesperson\u00a0Kingsley Wilson wrote,\u00a0“The United States does control the skies over Iran and maintains clear air superiority. Secretary Hegseth, Chairman Caine, and CENTCOM Admiral Cooper have all stated unequivocally that we control the skies, and the operational record proves it. We have conducted more than 13,000 combat flights and two successful rescue missions with zero effective challenge to our air dominance. That\u2019s not rhetoric. That\u2019s results. The Pentagon\u2019s assessment is grounded in real-world performance, not theoretical analysis from the sidelines.”<\/p>\n

A joint force mission<\/strong><\/p>\n

Air Force doctrine holds that gaining the ability to operate in hostile airspace is not just the service\u2019s responsibility, but \u201cone of the first priorities of the joint force.\u201d While heavy bombers have flown missions over parts of Iran and rescue helicopters can buzz in low and slow to the ground, other areas such as the Strait of Hormuz remain closed to ships due to air threats.<\/p>\n

\u201cI think that it’s worth emphasizing that Air Force doctrine is clear: that air superiority is for the joint force,\u201d Grieco said. \u201cSo, by that definition, we do not have air superiority near the Strait of Hormuz, because it’s predominantly drones and missiles that are keeping the strait closed, and they\u2019re keeping it closed to naval escort vessels.\u201d<\/p>\n

After the F-15E was shot down, an A-10 Thunderbolt II and multiple rescue helicopters and cargo planes were lost in the recovery mission, Caine said during the White House presser. Since the start of Operation Epic Fury in late February, Iran has destroyed or damaged multiple U.S. aircraft such as an F-35 which was forced to make an emergency landing after being hit during a combat mission.<\/p>\n

Those mounting losses stand in contrast to the administration\u2019s claims of total control of the Iranian skies, some former military officials say.<\/p>\n

\u201cI am somewhat surprised by the continued losses we were taking this deep into the conflict,\u201d said Jack Shanahan, a retired Air Force three-star general, who thought the U.S. should have \u201cmore air supremacy\u201d by this point.<\/p>\n

But others said a state of air superiority or supremacy can exist even with heavy aircraft losses.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cAir supremacy doesn’t mean that you’re completely without risk,\u201d a former military official said. \u201cThere are plenty of examples of how even with air supremacy and air superiority, you can still be challenged. I don’t think you ever get to an environment where you’re not completely without risk.\u201d<\/p>\n

This is particularly true at lower altitudes.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cWhen you’re down below 5,000 feet, air supremacy and superiority feels a lot different than when you’re up at 25,000 and 30,000 feet,\u201d they said.<\/p>\n

On Wednesday, Caine told reporters that 80 percent of Iran\u2019s air defenses had been destroyed, but that anti-aircraft threats still persisted at lower altitudes. Trump had claimed days earlier that Iranian anti-aircraft and radar had been destroyed; that the F-15E was shot down by a shoulder-mounted, heat-seeking missile; and that other aircraft took small-arms fire.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Shanahan said the administration\u2019s sweeping claims about air control have a parallel in its occasional reports about the number of targets struck in Iran. (More than 13,000, Caine said on Wednesday.) Neither is a direct measure of success, and may even be a distraction.<\/p>\n

\u00a0\u201cWe get caught up in the number of targets struck,\u201d Shanahan said. \u201cIt\u2019s back to almost Vietnam-era days when we started looking at body counts, number of tonnage of bombs dropped, but not understanding, maybe, the adversary has a different theory of victory in mind than you do. And if the regime survives, that may be their number-one criterion for success, whereas ours has seemed to be a little bit all over the map over the past 30 days.\u201d\n\n<\/svg><\/p>\n<\/div>\n