<\/p>\n
Hunting rifle cartridges come in waves. When my grandfather got out of the Army in the 1950s, military cartridges like .30-06 and 8mm Mauser dominated the woods. World War II and Korean War veterans knew firsthand about their potential, and there were plenty of cheap surplus sporter rifles on the market.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Next came the magnum craze of the mid-20th century. Hunters wanted big cartridges that shot flat and hit hard. This reached its peak in the 1970s, when hunters started to remember how much less it hurt to shoot a .270 Winchester than a .338 Winchester Magnum, but continued somewhat into the 1990s with true beasts like the .300 RUM and .30-378 Weatherby Magnum.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
After a short affair with short mags around the millennium, hunters were hit with another wave in the 2010s and 20s: long range. This latest trend has taken hold, and with it, an obsession with ballistic coefficients, ogives, and Data on Previous Engagements (DOPE). We went from being macho magnum shooters to number crunchers on calculators.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Despite the nerdiness of the long-range craze, it feels as though we\u2019ve somehow circled back to magnums. I\u2019m talking about the 6.5 PRC, 7mm PRC, and .300 PRC. They all have bigger case capacities, and they hold about the same amount of power as standbys like the .300 Win. Mag. and 7mm Rem Mag.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
With similar bullet diameters as those old magnums, it leads one to ask, what\u2019s the big deal? Are these cartridges just magnums with a fresh coat of marketing paint, or are they truly something new? If you\u2019ve wondered this or are a new .300 PRC owner who puts up with questions like that at deer camp (but you don\u2019t know how to answer), you\u2019ve come to the right place.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
To wrap our heads around this, it helps to understand what classic magnums like the .300 Win. Mag. offer hunters. It\u2019s easy to think these bigger cartridges are designed for bigger game, but trajectory, not necessarily energy, is where magnums really shine.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Most traditional magnum cartridges come from the .375 H&H\u2019s belted case. They are essentially necked-down versions of the classic dangerous-game cartridge. When you reduce the neck diameter of a cartridge, you generally get more velocity, and with that, a flatter trajectory.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Before calculators or dialing turrets, trajectory was king. By zeroing high (using a Maximum Point Blank Range Zero) with a standard deer hunting cartridge like a .30-06, you can hold dead on a deer\u2019s vital zone and make an ethical shot out to distances between 200 and 300 yards. With high-velocity magnums, you can push that beyond 300 yards, and by holding a little high, you can stretch things out to around 400 without dialing a turret or calculating trajectory in the field. It\u2019s highly effective with rudimentary optics and a big reason why hunters back then cared about laser-flat trajectory.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
When the 6.5 Creedmoor took hold, people started getting more and more into long-range target games like PRS. By then, we\u2019d learned more about bullet aerodynamics, and the 6.5 Creedmoor takes advantage of that with a longer, more efficient bullet and fast twist rate.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Laser rangefinders, ballistic calculators, and dialing turrets also made it easier to shoot cartridges with arcing trajectories at long range. Many abandoned the high-zero and holdovers from before and switched to a 100-yard zero and a DOPE card. This tech also helped those who wanted to shoot at a distance avoid nasty magnum recoil and barrel burn.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Trajectory matters less now, but there was still an equalizer, especially for long-range target shooters: the wind.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Even though we can plot bullet drop precisely, the wind will blow your shot off course. You can\u2019t beat the wind, but you can cut through it more efficiently with longer, heavier, high ballistic coefficient bullets. To shoot those bullets to their full potential and gain an edge in competition, you need more powder, which is why it seems we\u2019re back to the magnum. But there are some differences between newer \u201cmagnums\u201d and the old ones.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
To put it simply, classic magnum cartridges can shoot long, heavy bullets, but they suck at it for two reasons. The first is case design. To seat a 220-grain projectile in a .300 Win. Mag., you need to seat it down into the powder charge. This complicates things, will eventually damage the case, and gives you less room for powder.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
The second is the twist rate of the barrel. Older magnums have slower twist rates that can\u2019t stabilize long, high-BC bullets of today. You can build a custom .300 Win. Mag. with a faster twist, but you\u2019ll save about $2,000 and a bunch of hand-loading headaches if you just buy a rifle chambered for a cartridge that ends in the letters PRC.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
The shorter case of a PRC lets you seat a long bullet for maximum efficiency. It\u2019s fatter than a .375 H&H case, too, so you don\u2019t lose out on powder. Chamber throats are also cut to tighter tolerances for the PRCs. In traditional magnums, chamber throats are cut a little over caliber to allow for inconsistencies between ammo manufacturers. On a PRC, they usually almost match the bullet\u2019s caliber.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
On a ballistics table, there isn\u2019t much difference between, say, a .300 Win. Mag. and a .300 PRC shooting the same bullet, but the PRC can shoot long, heavy bullets more precisely. The thing is, though, it really isn\u2019t until you start getting out into really long range that the PRCs give you a significant edge. That\u2019s because PRCs are technically designed for target shooters.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
The claim of the PRC is that it will perform better at long range. That claim is very true. For hunters, though, long range might not be so long.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Target shooters eyeing up a 6.5, 7mm, or .300 PRC are thinking about how all of those small differences above will add up to real performance at distances well beyond 700 or even 1,000 yards. For example, at and beyond 1000 yards, you\u2019ll see around 10 inches less wind drift with a 7mm or .300 PRC (in a 10 mph crosswind) than you would with a comparable magnum. Most hunters don\u2019t take shots that far, though, for a lot of good reasons that have been explained and debated ad nauseam all over the Internet.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
When hunting at distances around or under 500 yards, the classic magnums have most PRC loads beat. There\u2019s a slight upside to a PRC on paper, but ammo and rifles are cheaper and easier to find for traditional magnums; they perform on game animals just about the same, they buck the wind just fine (because wind matters less at 300 yards than at 1,000), and they\u2019re easier to put in more rifle actions.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
You might see a few more fps and an inch or two less drop\/wind deflection from a .300 PRC compared to a .300 Win. Mag. at practical hunting distances, but you\u2019re really splitting hairs. If you want to pick a mule deer off a mountain a mile away, buy a PRC. But if you shoot big game at sane distances, my advice would be to buy a magnum.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
With that said, the PRC cartridges aren\u2019t all marketing hype. They can still hunt, and they hunt very well. The 6.5 PRC in particular makes an exceptional hunting cartridge for those dissatisfied with 6.5 Creedmoor. I like to think of the PRCs as highly versatile, letting you have one gun for hunting and shooting matches. And if you hunt in a place where long shots are common, long-range shooting matches are very helpful.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Even though you might not shoot game at 1,000 yards, shooting a match full of 1,000-yard targets makes 500-yard shots on animals much easier. A rifle chambered in 6.5, 7mm, or .300 PRC would make the perfect crossover gun to go between the field and the match. They also make custom-gun-quality performance and accuracy more attainable. For that, I\u2019d say they fall in a camp all their own.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n