Listen to the article
0:00
0:00
Watch full video on YouTube
Your Gun Training Is Useless Past 10 Yards?
© 2026 Cyber News. All Rights Reserved.
17 Comments
As someone who has been in a real-life self-defense situation, I can attest that the training I received was invaluable, regardless of the distance involved.
The idea that gun training is useless past 10 yards is a bold claim, I’d like to see some statistics or studies to back this up, especially considering the variety of firearms and training methods available.
There are several studies that suggest the majority of self-defense shootings occur within 10 feet, which supports the idea that training should focus on close-range scenarios.
The focus on close-range training might be due to the fact that most gunfights occur at close quarters, but this doesn’t necessarily mean that training for longer distances is useless.
The emphasis on the ineffectiveness of gun training past 10 yards might lead to a lack of preparedness for situations that require engaging targets at longer distances, such as in rural areas or when facing multiple attackers.
I’m skeptical about the notion that gun training is useless past 10 yards, considering the advancements in firearm technology and the various training methods that exist to improve accuracy at longer ranges.
I’ve noticed that the training I’ve received has focused primarily on close-quarters combat, but I believe it’s essential to also practice shooting at longer distances to be fully prepared for any situation.
Considering the average person’s lack of experience with firearms, focusing training on close-range scenarios might be practical, but it shouldn’t come at the expense of neglecting training for other possible scenarios.
I’ve had extensive gun training and I can confidently say that the effectiveness of that training depends on the individual’s skill level and the specific circumstances of the situation, not just the distance.
I’d like to know more about the specific training techniques that are recommended for improving accuracy and effectiveness at distances beyond 10 yards.
The statement that gun training is useless past 10 yards seems to oversimplify the complexities of real-world self-defense scenarios, where factors like lighting, obstacles, and multiple attackers can greatly affect the outcome.
The video’s claim has sparked an important discussion about the effectiveness of current gun training methods and the need for more comprehensive training that covers a range of scenarios and distances.
It would be interesting to see a comparison of different training methods and their effectiveness at various distances to better understand the limitations of gun training.
The video on YouTube mentions the importance of proper stance and grip when firing a gun, but I’m curious to know more about how these factors affect accuracy at longer distances.
The idea that training is useless past 10 yards contradicts the principles of many professional shooting courses that emphasize the importance of accuracy and control at various distances.
The assertion that gun training is useless past 10 yards highlights the need for a more nuanced approach to firearms training, one that considers the diverse range of scenarios and environments in which a gun might be used.
It’s concerning that some might interpret this as a reason to neglect training for longer distances, which could lead to a decrease in overall proficiency and safety.