Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Swedish technology firm Fractum is positioning its boulder-breaking solution as a safer alternative to traditional methods in open-pit mining operations, addressing critical safety concerns while improving productivity.
The International Council on Mining & Metals (ICMM) has long maintained that worker health and safety remains the mining industry’s top priority. This principle is increasingly relevant as mining companies face growing pressure to improve safety records while maintaini

...

Subscribe to Continue Reading

Get unlimited access to all premium content

Share.

James is a financial journalist specializing in mining and commodity markets. He has a keen eye for market trends and investment insights, providing readers with timely and accurate coverage.

38 Comments

  1. Even if it can’t handle the absolute largest boulders, reducing the need for blasting in most cases is a huge step forward.

  2. Even if it can’t handle the absolute largest boulders, reducing the need for blasting in most cases is a huge step forward.

  3. Even if it can’t handle the absolute largest boulders, reducing the need for blasting in most cases is a huge step forward.

  4. Even if it can’t handle the absolute largest boulders, reducing the need for blasting in most cases is a huge step forward.

  5. Even if it can’t handle the absolute largest boulders, reducing the need for blasting in most cases is a huge step forward.

  6. Even if it can’t handle the absolute largest boulders, reducing the need for blasting in most cases is a huge step forward.

  7. Even if it can’t handle the absolute largest boulders, reducing the need for blasting in most cases is a huge step forward.

  8. Even if it can’t handle the absolute largest boulders, reducing the need for blasting in most cases is a huge step forward.

  9. Even if it can’t handle the absolute largest boulders, reducing the need for blasting in most cases is a huge step forward.

  10. Even if it can’t handle the absolute largest boulders, reducing the need for blasting in most cases is a huge step forward.

  11. Even if it can’t handle the absolute largest boulders, reducing the need for blasting in most cases is a huge step forward.

  12. The high-energy breaking system sounds impressive. I’d love to see a demo to understand how it compares to our current methods.

  13. Even if it can’t handle the absolute largest boulders, reducing the need for blasting in most cases is a huge step forward.

  14. The high-energy breaking system sounds impressive. I’d love to see a demo to understand how it compares to our current methods.

  15. Even if it can’t handle the absolute largest boulders, reducing the need for blasting in most cases is a huge step forward.

  16. The high-energy breaking system sounds impressive. I’d love to see a demo to understand how it compares to our current methods.

  17. Even if it can’t handle the absolute largest boulders, reducing the need for blasting in most cases is a huge step forward.

  18. The high-energy breaking system sounds impressive. I’d love to see a demo to understand how it compares to our current methods.

  19. Even if it can’t handle the absolute largest boulders, reducing the need for blasting in most cases is a huge step forward.

  20. The high-energy breaking system sounds impressive. I’d love to see a demo to understand how it compares to our current methods.

  21. Even if it can’t handle the absolute largest boulders, reducing the need for blasting in most cases is a huge step forward.

  22. The high-energy breaking system sounds impressive. I’d love to see a demo to understand how it compares to our current methods.

  23. Even if it can’t handle the absolute largest boulders, reducing the need for blasting in most cases is a huge step forward.

  24. The high-energy breaking system sounds impressive. I’d love to see a demo to understand how it compares to our current methods.

  25. Even if it can’t handle the absolute largest boulders, reducing the need for blasting in most cases is a huge step forward.

  26. The high-energy breaking system sounds impressive. I’d love to see a demo to understand how it compares to our current methods.

  27. Even if it can’t handle the absolute largest boulders, reducing the need for blasting in most cases is a huge step forward.

  28. The high-energy breaking system sounds impressive. I’d love to see a demo to understand how it compares to our current methods.

  29. Even if it can’t handle the absolute largest boulders, reducing the need for blasting in most cases is a huge step forward.

  30. The high-energy breaking system sounds impressive. I’d love to see a demo to understand how it compares to our current methods.

  31. Even if it can’t handle the absolute largest boulders, reducing the need for blasting in most cases is a huge step forward.

  32. The high-energy breaking system sounds impressive. I’d love to see a demo to understand how it compares to our current methods.

  33. Even if it can’t handle the absolute largest boulders, reducing the need for blasting in most cases is a huge step forward.

  34. The high-energy breaking system sounds impressive. I’d love to see a demo to understand how it compares to our current methods.

  35. Even if it can’t handle the absolute largest boulders, reducing the need for blasting in most cases is a huge step forward.

  36. The high-energy breaking system sounds impressive. I’d love to see a demo to understand how it compares to our current methods.

  37. Even if it can’t handle the absolute largest boulders, reducing the need for blasting in most cases is a huge step forward.

  38. The high-energy breaking system sounds impressive. I’d love to see a demo to understand how it compares to our current methods.

Leave A Reply