<\/p>\n
London\u2019s boroughs and the Mayor are advocating for a formalised ‘Combined Board’ to streamline decision-making, accelerate funding, and enhance services amid ongoing governance debates and national reforms.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
London\u2019s boroughs have renewed calls for a more formalised and collaborative governance model with the Mayor of London to accelerate funding delivery and improve services for residents. Councillor Claire Holland, chair of the cross-party London Councils group, has advocated for a “Combined Board” model, which would embed closer cooperation between the Greater London Authority (GLA) and boroughs, aiming to overcome the delays associated with the current voluntary arrangements.<\/p>\n
Currently, boroughs and the GLA collaborate on initiatives like the Warmer Homes Programme, which targets energy-saving efforts for vulnerable groups. However, as Councillor Holland highlighted at the annual Labour Party conference, the absence of a statutory framework means that collaboration is not guaranteed and decision-making can be slowed. She argued that \u201chardwiring\u201d such partnerships through a formal Combined Board, similar to structures in Manchester or the West Midlands, would streamline funding flows and enhance efficiency, although she acknowledged the need to prioritise the new integrated settlement due to be handed to London next year.<\/p>\n
In April 2025, the leaders of all 32 London boroughs reinforced this position with a united statement proposing a Combined Board comprising the Mayor and members of London Councils\u2019 Executive Committee. Their aim is to give London a governance model more in line with other combined authorities across England, where devolved powers and budgets are collaboratively overseen to better meet local needs.<\/p>\n
Despite these calls, the government\u2019s recent English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, introduced in July 2025, does not address London\u2019s situation, reflecting the complexity of the capital\u2019s governance. A September 2025 report by the GLA Oversight Committee, titled “Trusting London to deliver: our place in the Government\u2019s devolution reforms,” explicitly rejected the Combined Board proposal, citing London\u2019s distinctiveness as a significantly larger and more complex city with 33 local authorities. The committee argued that managing a strategic authority with 34 decision-making bodies, including the GLA, would be unmanageable. They also raised concerns that a Combined Board could exclude some London areas from decision-making, weaken transparency and accountability, and fragment the city\u2019s established mayoral governance model.<\/p>\n
London\u2019s unique model currently includes the London Assembly\u2019s role in representing the entire city and scrutinising the GLA\u2019s decisions. The committee emphasised that this structure distinguishes London\u2019s devolution from other English cities and cautioned against reforms that might dilute the Mayor\u2019s authority or confuse governance.<\/p>\n
The Mayor of London\u2019s office responded by reaffirming the Mayor\u2019s broad mandate and ongoing collaboration with local authorities. A spokesperson emphasised the Mayor\u2019s programme, which includes major initiatives such as ensuring free school meals for all state primary children, delivering the highest number of new council homes since the 1970s, improving public transport affordability, and leading efforts on climate change and crime reduction. They stressed that the Mayor remains committed to working with London Councils on the integrated settlement to enhance service delivery.<\/p>\n
This ongoing debate unfolds against wider governance challenges in London. For instance, previous collaborative attempts like the Tri-borough shared services initiative\u2014linking Westminster, Hammersmith and Fulham, and Kensington and Chelsea councils from 2011 until 2018\u2014showcase both potential and pitfalls of shared-local governance models. More recently, London Councils and the GLA have jointly tackled specific issues such as the fragmented funding landscape for retrofitting social housing, recommending the creation of a London Office for Retrofit to better coordinate efforts and funding.<\/p>\n
Furthermore, the GLA Oversight Committee has also emphasised the importance of consistent and accountable public consultation practices across the GLA group, recognising that transparent citizen engagement is critical to successful governance and policy implementation in such a diverse and populous city.<\/p>\n
With the GLA Act now 25 years old, the conversation about London\u2019s devolution and governance structures remains alive, though pressure for immediate reform appears tempered by the government\u2019s broader devolution agenda across England. As Councillor Holland noted, the focus for now is on establishing a robust and integrated funding settlement for London, leaving deeper structural discussions to possibly unfold at a later date.<\/p>\n