<\/p>\n
I used to bristle when I worked at The Sunday Times and a friend said he had a subscription to the paper version for two reasons \u2013 and neither had anything to do with the journalism. First, he was a big fan of the crossword, which he regarded as the best on Fleet Street. Second, he said the broadsheet format made the paper excellent kindling for his wood-burning stove.<\/p>\n
\nA few years later I looked at the data around the Times tablet app, which was famous for the incredibly long time, more than 45 minutes on average, that readers would spend with it every day. Again, this was a chastening experience: it turned out that a large proportion of that time was accounted for by the crossword. <\/p>\n
\nI thought about these stories this week as I read the new [Pugpig Media App Report 2026](https:\/\/www.pugpig.com\/pugpig-media-app-report-2026\/?utm_source=linkedin&utm_medium=newsletters&utm_campaign=media_app_report_2026&utm_content=HBM). Drawing on data from more than 440 apps across 140 publishers, among its findings was that games players are among the most committed users of its clients\u2019 news apps, spending an average of 1,000 minutes a month on them. <\/p>\n
\nAudio listeners and video watchers also spend significantly more time than text-only readers. Users who search, save and share content \u2013 also behaviours that are adjacent to journalism, rather than the main act \u2013 show markedly higher loyalty and return rates than those who just read. <\/p>\n
\nThe report puts it plainly: the best-performing apps “are not simply content containers: they are products that create stronger habits and more active reader relationships\u201d.<\/p>\n
What makes the finding particularly pointed is the gap it reveals between what users actually do and what publishers believe they do. Ask publishers, as Pugpig did, what content drives engagement in their apps and 30% will tell you it’s news and breaking stories. This was the single highest response in the survey. Puzzles and games came in at just 11%.<\/p>\n
Yet the behavioural data tells a rather different story. It turns out that the feature keeping a subscriber opening an app at seven every morning might be a word puzzle, not the splash.<\/p>\n
Publishers always had a strong suspicion that this was true in print. I recall a redesign of a section I edited which included the crossword on the back page. The editor in chief had one overriding instruction as the process began. \u201cIt\u2019s the first law of newspapers,\u201d he said. \u201cNever, ever move the crossword.\u201d I didn\u2019t and the redesign was well received.<\/p>\n
Everyone has seen how well puzzles have worked for the New York Times, but now it\u2019s time to acknowledge their impact more broadly. If games players are your most committed users, then games are not a peripheral product feature but a driver of retention. Every subs-based publisher currently agonising over churn might usefully ask how many of their at-risk subscribers have ever completed a puzzle in the app, and what the correlation looks like.<\/p>\n
What should publishers do differently? The first step is to stop treating habit-forming features as secondary. If the data shows that games, video, audio and interactive content drive the most committed users, those features belong at the heart of the product, not in a sub-menu. They deserve investment proportionate to their commercial value.<\/p>\n
The second is to reconsider how apps are marketed. Most publishers still promote their apps on the strength of their journalism, which is understandable but perhaps incomplete. The commuter who downloads an app because of an exclusive investigation may not stay for the next one; the commuter who builds a morning routine around the daily puzzle probably will.<\/p>\n
The third is to close the measurement gap identified by the Pugpig report: many publishers say they still cannot properly track retention by feature or attribute subscription renewals to specific in-app features or behaviours. Until they can, the case for investing in anything beyond news content will always struggle to get past Finance.
\nNone of this requires publishers to become games companies. It requires them to be honest about what they have always been: habit businesses that use great journalism as their primary reason for existing, and everything else as prompts for daily return.<\/p>\n