{"id":21882,"date":"2026-04-08T09:03:00","date_gmt":"2026-04-08T09:03:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sawahsolutions.com\/alpha\/lessons-from-a-digital-launch-10-years-on\/"},"modified":"2026-04-08T09:06:13","modified_gmt":"2026-04-08T09:06:13","slug":"lessons-from-a-digital-launch-10-years-on","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sawahsolutions.com\/alpha\/lessons-from-a-digital-launch-10-years-on\/","title":{"rendered":"Lessons from a digital launch 10 years on"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<div>\n<p><em>This first appeared in our weekly newsletter Editor\u2019s picks. Sign up <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/tomorrowspublisher.today\/newsletter\/\">here<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<p>Ten years ago this week we launched the new Times and Sunday Times website and smartphone app. It remains the most significant product launch in which I have been involved.<\/p>\n<p>The project took a huge amount of time \u2013 it took the best part of two years to come to fruition \u2013 and energy. During that period I\u2019d say about 80% of my time was devoted to thinking about it, promoting it internally, managing expectations, and making sure we hit milestones.<\/p>\n<p>This wasn\u2019t just a regular kind of launch though. It had multiple moving parts, of which two were particularly significant.<\/p>\n<p>First, we were combining the digital output of two titles that shared a name, an owner and a subscription but, in their eyes, little else. Newspapers do sibling rivalry like nobody else. An example: when I worked on The Sunday Times, my office access pass did not work on the floors occupied by The Times, which every Monday would run stories casting doubt on our Sunday scoops. You can imagine what fun it was to tell the titles that from here on they would be sharing a website and an app.<\/p>\n<p>Second, we were radically changing our publishing strategy by moving to edition-based publishing online. We would publish the overnight edition at midnight and then update only at 9am, noon and 5pm. Anything that happened in between would have to wait. (And yes, of course if something major happened we would break the cycle.) The idea was to drive habit among users, to get them coming back more than the average number of times a day, which was just over one. The strategy was based on user research and data but, as you can probably imagine, was controversial.<\/p>\n<p>This is all ancient history now, but what did I learn that would change how I would approach such a project today? In no particular order, here are my five key learnings:<\/p>\n<p>1 Nobody likes change<\/p>\n<p>I found out quite how hard change is by putting a button at the top of our new website and inviting readers to tell us how they liked it. We linked it up to a Slack channel and boy, was that a chastening experience.<\/p>\n<p>The initial feedback was horrible. More than 16,000 people filled in the feedback form and 99% were critical. \u201cWho is the idiot responsible for this change? Sack him immediately,\u201d wrote one that unsurprisingly I remember to this day.<\/p>\n<p>And so this went on, day after day, for a few weeks. But then eventually the tide turned and the reviews began to get more positive. \u201cI may have been a bit hasty in my previous criticism,\u201d wrote one. Crucially, the numbers backed up this point of view: after the first few weeks they started rising dramatically. Visits soon doubled and the number of articles read tripled.<\/p>\n<p>My advice to those launching new products today is put your tin hats on and await a battering. But if you\u2019ve done your prep work right, keep the faith and the critics will eventually punch themselves out. I know of plenty of products that have been pulled back far too quickly after the initial feedback was negative. Give them time.<\/p>\n<p>2 The internal sell is crucial<\/p>\n<p>This may sound obvious but it\u2019s almost as important to win the battle surrounding a new product within your company as it is to defeat the ultimate enemy aka the reader (joking, joking!).<\/p>\n<p>I delivered the presentation pitching the new website and app more than 35 times. I knew it off by heart. I now cannot listen to the Aphex Twin song that the design agency put over a video that was part of it.<\/p>\n<p>I even delivered it twice to one executive who had returned from lunch a touch \u201ctired and emotional\u201d. Definitely tired as he appeared to fall asleep during some of the more technical slides. We returned the next day and all was fine.<\/p>\n<p>But this process was worthwhile. There were no last-minute changes of approach or design. Everyone was on board (at least at the start).<\/p>\n<p>3 Users know what they want<\/p>\n<p>More than once I\u2019ve heard a newsroom greybeard say: \u201cYeah, but users don\u2019t really know what they want.\u201d Actually, they do, they really do.<\/p>\n<p>The website and app project was marked by being user-centric, which was rare 10 years ago. We commissioned Ideo, a California-based design thinking agency, to help us with the project and they embedded themselves in the lives of our users and potential users. They followed them around to work out how news fit into their days.<\/p>\n<p>The feedback was clear. Our readers weren\u2019t as obsessed with the news as our newsroom and typically were happy, indeed happier, with periodic updates rather than a never-ending stream of news. Also they valued analysis and opinion, our \u201ctake\u201d on the news, much more than knowing the latest breaking news, which they said they got elsewhere.<\/p>\n<p>As I said before, responding to those macro user needs really worked and I would urge you to do the same. You might have a smart new product feature in your head that excites you, but a far better route to follow is letting the users guide you.<\/p>\n<p>4 Good ideas don\u2019t always win<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019ve said that our new products worked with the readers. But ultimately we followed the edition-based strategy for five years and then it stopped (after I left the newspapers).<\/p>\n<p>Why? I think the main reason was a change of personnel at News UK. Many of the senior people who had been involved in the genesis of the project left even before it was launched. A number of them left thereafter.<\/p>\n<p>And I\u2019m sure I don\u2019t need to tell you that a predecessor\u2019s idea is never a good one. That\u2019s just human nature.<\/p>\n<p>So, for example, we never marketed the editions strategy and product development effectively ended after launch as a new tech team came in and saw their priority as being the underlying platform. The only consistency came from the editors who mostly stuck with the project even though it went against some of their newshound instincts.<\/p>\n<p>If I had to go again, I would have insisted on selling what we were producing (seems obvious, no?) and also I\u2019d have used the tools available to me and my team, notably push notifications and emails, to really drive home the editions concept.<\/p>\n<p>But that doesn\u2019t make me bitter: the website and app were only (lightly) renewed last year and experience has made me realise that the quality of an idea does not always determine its success.<\/p>\n<p>5 \u2026 but they can have an afterlife<\/p>\n<p>The Times has moved on from editions, but in the past couple of years the news industry, I would suggest, has moved towards it. Not publicly, but in its practice.<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019m told that at the Daily Mail they now talk of having stories ready for \u201cthe 9\u201d or \u201cthe 5\u201d, which are packages of content for 9am or 5pm. They don\u2019t announce them as editions to their readers, but they are clearly looking for habitual use at those times.<\/p>\n<p>User needs is a concept that is, happily, spreading rapidly throughout the industry. A key learning I\u2019ve picked from almost everyone I\u2019ve talked to about it is that the \u201cUpdate me\u201d user need is the most produced but least read type of story. This was exactly what readers told us a decade ago and why we dialled back on breaking news.<\/p>\n<p>My prediction is that we move more into a \u201cbriefing\u201d rather than \u201cinforming\u201d mode as the AI revolution takes hold.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, what are newsletters, recently the obsession of the industry thanks to Substack and others, if not editions?<\/p>\n<p>All in all, we can be proud of what we did all those years ago. Hat tip to Frank Praverman, Kiska Harrop, Dan Griffiths, Ramin Beheshti, Nick Petrie, Ben Whitelaw, Suzi Watford and everyone else who made it happen. But most of all to the late, great Pat Long, who once said: \u201cI won\u2019t be around to see it, but I hope to have done my bit to keep these papers going for another 200 years.\u201d<br \/>\nHave a great weekend, Alan<\/p>\n<p><em>Alan Hunter is a co-founder of HBM Advisory, which helps organisations navigate the transformation of their content businesses, from finding the right strategy to producing the right content, and of course everything AI. Contact us for more information at <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"http:\/\/aipublishingassociation.makes.news\/cdn-cgi\/l\/email-protection#b3daddd5dcf3dbd1ded2d7c5dac0dcc1ca9dd0dcde\"><span class=\"__cf_email__\" data-cfemail=\"3e575058517e565c535f5a48574d514c47105d5153\">[email\u00a0protected]<\/span><\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<p><\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This first appeared in our weekly newsletter Editor\u2019s picks. Sign up here Ten years ago this week we launched the new Times and Sunday Times website and smartphone app. It remains the most significant product launch in which I have been involved. The project took a huge amount of time \u2013 it took the best<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":21883,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[132],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-21882","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-publishing-news"},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sawahsolutions.com\/alpha\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21882","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sawahsolutions.com\/alpha\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sawahsolutions.com\/alpha\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sawahsolutions.com\/alpha\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sawahsolutions.com\/alpha\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21882"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/sawahsolutions.com\/alpha\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21882\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21884,"href":"https:\/\/sawahsolutions.com\/alpha\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21882\/revisions\/21884"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sawahsolutions.com\/alpha\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/21883"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sawahsolutions.com\/alpha\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21882"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sawahsolutions.com\/alpha\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21882"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sawahsolutions.com\/alpha\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21882"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}