Ongoing resident doctor industrial action in the NHS risks massive service reductions and heightened patient safety concerns, with hospital leaders warning of severe operational impacts amid financial strains and government disputes.
The NHS is facing mounting pressure as ongoing resident doctor strikes threaten to force cuts in frontline staff and the scaling back of operations, scans, and appointments. Health leaders from the NHS Confederation and NHS Providers have warned that the financial burden of the strikes, estimated to cost around £240 million for a five-day walkout, cannot be absorbed within the current constrained budgets. With hospitals having to cancel or reschedule services and pay inflated overtime rates to consultants covering for striking juniors, there is increasing concern that patient care will be severely disrupted.
Thousands of resident doctors began a planned five-day strike, marking one in a series of industrial actions over pay disputes despite having received pay rises totalling nearly 29% over the past three years. Health Secretary Wes Streeting has sharply criticised the British Medical Association (BMA), accusing it of acting like a “cartel” and attempting to hold the NHS to ransom with its demands. NHS leaders, however, stress that the strikes will have “excessive disruption” on patients who may face longer waits for essential care as the NHS balances maintaining urgent treatment with financial pressures.
Sir Jim Mackey, chief executive of NHS England, has urged NHS trusts to maintain at least 95% of non-urgent care during the strike period, stating that cancellations and rescheduling should only occur in exceptional circumstances to safeguard patient safety. Despite these efforts to protect services, the NHS Confederation and NHS Providers acknowledge that tens of thousands of appointments, tests, and operations are likely to be delayed or cancelled, especially with the added strain of an early flu season increasing demand and staff sickness. This jeopardises progress in reducing waiting lists, which although recently showed a slight decline after months of growth, remain at a record high level of over 7 million treatments pending.
Matthew Taylor, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, emphasised the financial impact of strikes, noting that the last five-day stoppage cost the NHS around £300 million, money not accounted for in already tight health budgets. He warned that continued industrial action could compel NHS leaders to cut staff or reduce services to balance the books. Taylor urged the BMA to recognise that the strikes are disproportionate given current financial constraints and the sizeable pay increases doctors have already received.
The British Medical Association, meanwhile, has made clear it will not agree to derogations, requests to call doctors off picket lines to cover planned NHS work, unless all planned activities have been cancelled and other staff are incentivised to provide cover. The BMA insists these measures are designed to ensure patient safety in extreme circumstances, not to avoid disruption caused by the strike. This stance complicates hospital efforts to minimise the impact of industrial action on patient care, given the BMA’s consultant rate card demanding significant fees for cover outside contracted hours.
NHS Providers’ chief executive Daniel Elkeles stressed that safety remains the highest priority and that derogation requests are made in good faith by senior clinical leaders to protect patients under exceptional conditions. In response to the ongoing dispute, Streeting appealed directly to resident doctors to defy the BMA and continue working for their patients, emphasising government proposals for more specialist training places and exam fee support.
Conversely, Dr Jack Fletcher, chair of the BMA’s resident doctors committee, accused NHS managers of emotional blackmailing frontline staff taking legitimate industrial action to defend their pay and working conditions. Dr Fletcher highlighted persistent NHS systemic problems, such as doctors having to sit on bins due to a lack of chairs, crowded corridors, soaring A&E waits, and persistent rota gaps, and rejected the narrative that the NHS is improving. He insisted the strikes are a fight for the future of the profession and the health service amid government plans to cut pay further next year.
The industrial action adds to long-standing operational pressures within the NHS. Recent NHS England figures show that although the NHS protected more appointments during the latest strike than in previous rounds, maintaining about 93% of planned care, less than a third of resident doctors participated in the strike, indicating a slightly reduced level of industrial disruption. Nonetheless, NHS leaders warn that the recorded cancellations of over 835,000 procedures since last December represent only part of the problem, with actual disruption likely higher due to unrecorded cancellations and the administrative burden placed on staff.
Additional concerns arise from reports that NHS trusts are already scaling back frontline clinical posts and patient services to manage budgets. Surveys indicate many trusts have cut or are considering cutting services such as virtual wards, diabetes clinics, rehabilitation, mental health therapies, and smoking cessation programmes. These measures reflect the severe financial trials NHS organisations face amid rising demand, escalating costs, and the cumulative strain of repeated industrial action.
As the winter season approaches, the NHS remains in a precarious state, grappling with overcrowded emergency departments and growing ‘corridor care’, patients waiting for hours in A&E on trolleys or chairs due to lack of beds. Experts warn this situation causes avoidable harm and places vulnerable patients at risk.
Despite these challenges, NHS England continues encouraging patients to attend appointments where possible and seek emergency care as usual. NHS services including 111, GP practices, and urgent emergency services remain operational, with safety precautions aimed at mitigating the impact of industrial action.
The coming months may prove critical in defining the trajectory of NHS capacity and resilience. With the BMA strike mandate in place until January, hospital leaders and government officials alike urge a return to constructive negotiations to avoid further disruptions to patient care and prevent longer-term damage to the health service’s recovery efforts.
📌 Reference Map:
- [1] Daily Mail – Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
- [2] NHS Confederation – Paragraphs 1, 3, 6, 7
- [3] NHS England – Paragraph 11
- [4] ITV News – Paragraph 7
- [5] NHS Confederation – Paragraph 13
- [6] ITV News – Paragraph 14
- [7] NHS England – Paragraph 15
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
7
Notes:
The narrative discusses a five-day strike by resident doctors in July 2025 over pay disputes, with the earliest known publication date of similar content being July 9, 2025. ([itv.com](https://www.itv.com/news/2025-07-09/resident-doctors-confirm-five-days-of-strike-action-in-july?utm_source=openai)) The report includes updated data on the impact of the strike, which may justify a higher freshness score but should still be flagged. ([england.nhs.uk](https://www.england.nhs.uk/2025/08/nhs-protected-thousands-more-appointments-during-doctors-strike/?utm_source=openai))
Quotes check
Score:
6
Notes:
The report includes direct quotes from Health Secretary Wes Streeting and BMA representatives. The earliest known usage of these quotes is from July 25, 2025. ([itv.com](https://www.itv.com/news/2025-07-25/starmer-makes-last-minute-plea-to-resident-doctors-as-thousands-to-strike?utm_source=openai)) Variations in wording are noted, which may indicate paraphrasing or selective quoting.
Source reliability
Score:
5
Notes:
The narrative originates from the Daily Mail, a publication with a reputation for sensationalism and potential bias. ([itv.com](https://www.itv.com/news/2025-07-24/nhs-bosses-say-doctors-strike-is-a-crushing-blow-for-patients?utm_source=openai))
Plausability check
Score:
8
Notes:
The claims about the impact of the strike on NHS services are plausible and align with reports from other reputable outlets. ([england.nhs.uk](https://www.england.nhs.uk/2025/08/nhs-protected-thousands-more-appointments-during-doctors-strike/?utm_source=openai)) However, the tone of the report is unusually dramatic, which may indicate a need for further scrutiny.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): FAIL
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The narrative presents a timely account of the July 2025 resident doctors’ strike, incorporating updated data on its impact. However, the reliance on a sensationalist source, potential paraphrasing of quotes, and dramatic tone raise concerns about the report’s credibility and accuracy. ([itv.com](https://www.itv.com/news/2025-07-24/nhs-bosses-say-doctors-strike-is-a-crushing-blow-for-patients?utm_source=openai))

