Veteran lyricist Javed Akhtar has publicly denounced a malicious AI-generated deepfake video falsely depicting him claiming he has ‘ultimately turned to God’, signalling a rising concern over the misuse of synthetic media and potential legal repercussions in India.
Veteran writer and lyricist Javed Akhtar has publicly denounced an AI‑generated video circulating on social media that falsely shows him saying he has “ultimately turned to God,” calling the clip “rubbish” and saying he is seriously considering legal action. According to the report by The420.in, Akhtar posted the denial on his social accounts and criticised the video as a deliberate attempt to mislead viewers. [1]
The fabricated clip uses a computer‑generated image of Akhtar wearing a topi (described variously as a cap or skull cap in other accounts) and attributes to him a statement he did not make. India Today and ABP Live reported that Akhtar has warned he may report the matter to cyber police and pursue legal remedies against those who created and shared the deepfake. Times of India and Moneycontrol similarly quoted him as threatening strict legal action. [2][4][3][5]
The episode has reignited wider concerns about the misuse of generative AI to produce deepfakes that can rapidly damage reputation and stoke social tensions. Government officials and digital‑media experts have flagged a rise in AI‑morphed videos targeting politicians, celebrities and private individuals in India, and noted that existing laws on impersonation, defamation and misinformation are being applied to AI‑generated material. Industry observers quoted by The420.in and The Statesman warned that platform takedown policies remain uneven and, once a deepfake goes viral, “the damage is already done.” [1][6]
Akhtar, a long‑standing public voice on rationalism and social issues, said the clip appears designed to misrepresent his firmly held positions and provoke controversy. The Telegraph India and The Statesman pointed out that his self‑described atheism makes the false attribution especially inflammatory in a diverse society where religious sensitivities can be exploited. [7][6]
Legal experts say pursuing cyber complaints and defamation cases in such matters can set important precedents and act as a deterrent, but they also note procedural hurdles and the speed at which content spreads. Reports in India Today and Times of India emphasise calls from technology and media specialists for clearer regulatory frameworks for generative AI, faster takedown mechanisms from social platforms and stronger accountability for creators and intermediaries. [2][3]
For now, Akhtar’s public denunciation adds to a growing chorus of prominent figures demanding stricter safeguards and clearer accountability for the misuse of artificial intelligence. Several outlets report he has not yet confirmed whether a formal complaint has been filed, but his statement signals a likely legal course of action that could test how existing laws are applied to synthetic media. [1][5]
##Reference Map:
- [1] (The420.in) – Paragraph 1, Paragraph 2, Paragraph 3, Paragraph 6
- [2] (India Today) – Paragraph 2, Paragraph 5
- [3] (Times of India) – Paragraph 2, Paragraph 5
- [4] (ABP Live) – Paragraph 2
- [5] (Moneycontrol) – Paragraph 2, Paragraph 6
- [6] (The Statesman) – Paragraph 3, Paragraph 4
- [7] (The Telegraph India) – Paragraph 4
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
10
Notes:
The narrative is fresh, with the earliest known publication date being January 2, 2026. The report is based on a press release, which typically warrants a high freshness score. No discrepancies in figures, dates, or quotes were found. The content has not been republished across low-quality sites or clickbait networks. No earlier versions show different figures, dates, or quotes. The article includes updated data and does not recycle older material. No similar content has appeared more than 7 days earlier. The update justifies a higher freshness score and should not be flagged.
Quotes check
Score:
10
Notes:
The direct quotes from Javed Akhtar are consistent across multiple reputable sources, with no variations in wording. The earliest known usage of these quotes is from January 2, 2026. No identical quotes appear in earlier material, indicating originality.
Source reliability
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative originates from The420.in, a news outlet that is not widely known or established. However, the report is corroborated by multiple reputable organisations, including India Today, Times of India, and Moneycontrol, which strengthens the overall reliability. The person mentioned, Javed Akhtar, is a well-known public figure with a verifiable presence.
Plausability check
Score:
9
Notes:
The claims made in the narrative are plausible and align with known facts. Javed Akhtar has publicly denounced a fake AI-generated video, and his statements are consistent across multiple reputable sources. The narrative lacks excessive or off-topic detail unrelated to the claim. The tone is consistent with typical corporate or official language. No inconsistencies in language or tone were noted.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The narrative is fresh, original, and corroborated by multiple reputable sources. The quotes are consistent and originate from a verifiable public figure. The claims are plausible and align with known facts, with no inconsistencies or excessive detail noted. The source, while not widely known, is supported by established organisations, enhancing the overall reliability.
Supercharge Your Content Strategy
Feel free to test this content on your social media sites to see whether it works for your community.
