Industry leaders at Reuters NEXT reveal that while AI’s rapid adoption drives market growth and innovation, it also raises profound concerns over job displacement, market volatility, and environmental sustainability, demanding coordinated policy and strategic responses.
Industry leaders gathering at the Reuters NEXT conference in New York framed the rapid rise of artificial intelligence as an economic and social inflection point, likening its scale to the internet boom while warning that the effects are already reverberating through markets, corporate strategy and the labour force. According to Reuters, AI has drawn trillions in capital, contributed materially to GDP growth in early 2025 and helped drive a surge in market valuations concentrated in a small group of firms. [1][2][4]
Executives described a workplace in flux, with companies accelerating AI deployments and some clients pressing for immediate headcount reductions as tools are rolled out. Writer co-founder and CEO May Habib told the conference that customers have requested rapid workforce trims of up to 30% as they adopt AI systems, while SAP chief executive Christian Klein said employees are raising persistent concerns about the future of their roles, including legal functions now exposed to AI-driven efficiency. Reuters reported that a U.S. Federal Reserve study and a Reuters/Ipsos poll underline these anxieties, with the poll finding 71% of respondents worried AI could permanently displace workers. [1][2]
Labour-market indicators portray a mixed and uneasy picture. U.S. Department of Labor data cited by Reuters show joblessness rising sharply among recent college graduates, with unemployment for 20- to 24-year-olds holding bachelor’s degrees at 9.5%, well above the national rate; Challenger, Gray & Christmas figures also show year-to-date employer job-cut announcements remain significantly higher than a year earlier even as monthly planned cuts fell in November. Observers link much of this squeeze to automation and AI’s disproportionate impact on entry-level roles. [1][3]
A counter-narrative at the conference urged policy and business choices that treat AI as a complement to labour. Joseph Lavorgna, counsellor to the U.S. Treasury secretary, argued the focus should be on enhancing productivity and encouraging firms to invest in AI as a workforce complement rather than solely a cost-cutting tool. BlackRock executives cautioned, however, that heavy concentration of AI investments raises market risks: crowding and leverage could produce volatility even as asset managers increase exposure to energy and infrastructure to service growing data-centre demand. [1][2][4]
The human and cultural costs of rapid AI adoption drew particular attention from media and creative industry figures, who warned of threats to livelihoods and to the distinctiveness of creative work. Media executive Shari Redstone urged the industry to be assertive in protecting writers, actors and musicians from technological displacement, and actor Sarah Jessica Parker told Reuters editor-in-chief Alessandra Galloni that audiences still seek the “live nerve” of human performance despite digital advances. [1]
Concerns also extended to the environmental and infrastructure strain of AI. A Reuters/Ipsos survey found 61% worried about rising electricity use from data centres, and Cisco Systems’ Jeff Schultz warned that agentic AI demands much more stable and intense network and power resources than earlier chatbot models. Backlash to new, energy‑heavy data‑centre construction is already surfacing in parts of the United States even among political constituencies broadly supportive of AI. BlackRock and other investors are responding by shifting capital toward energy and infrastructure firms positioned to benefit from rising demand. [1][4]
The anxieties are feeding wider generational and political unease. Polling reported by Axios and Harvard finds many young Americans, particularly Generation Z, deeply pessimistic about economic prospects and worried that AI will narrow their opportunities, contributing to declining confidence in public institutions and heightened political frustration. Market jitters have reinforced the sense of instability: reports of downgraded growth expectations for major AI players triggered sharp sell-offs, underscoring how quickly investor sentiment can swing around perceived demand risks. [5][6]
Taken together, the conference underscored a dominant paradox: AI’s extraordinary promise for productivity and innovation sits alongside immediate, tangible disruptions to jobs, markets and infrastructure. The debate among corporate leaders, investors and policymakers at Reuters NEXT reflected competing priorities, spur investment and manage risk, protect livelihoods and adapt training, while leaving clear that the social and economic consequences will require coordinated policy, corporate strategy and investment in workforce transition. [1][2][3][4][5]
📌 Reference Map:
##Reference Map:
- [1] (Storyboard18 / Reuters lead article) – Paragraph 1, Paragraph 2, Paragraph 3, Paragraph 5, Paragraph 6, Paragraph 8
- [2] (Reuters: AI rise at Reuters NEXT) – Paragraph 1, Paragraph 2, Paragraph 4, Paragraph 8
- [3] (Reuters: Challenger job cuts) – Paragraph 3, Paragraph 8
- [4] (Reuters: BlackRock on AI markets) – Paragraph 1, Paragraph 4, Paragraph 6, Paragraph 8
- [5] (Axios / Harvard Youth Poll) – Paragraph 7, Paragraph 8
- [6] (Axios: AI stocks & Microsoft) – Paragraph 7
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
10
Notes:
The narrative is based on a press release from the Reuters NEXT conference held on December 4, 2025, which is the earliest known publication date. The report includes updated data and quotes from the conference, justifying a high freshness score. No earlier versions with different figures, dates, or quotes were found. The content is not republished across low-quality sites or clickbait networks. The inclusion of updated data and quotes from the conference justifies a higher freshness score.
Quotes check
Score:
10
Notes:
The direct quotes from May Habib, Christian Klein, and Joseph Lavorgna are unique to this report and do not appear in earlier material. No identical quotes were found in earlier publications. The absence of earlier matches indicates potentially original or exclusive content.
Source reliability
Score:
10
Notes:
The narrative originates from a reputable organisation, Reuters, which is known for its journalistic standards and credibility. This strengthens the reliability of the information presented.
Plausability check
Score:
10
Notes:
The claims about AI’s impact on the economy and job market are consistent with recent discussions and reports from various reputable sources. The data on job displacement and economic impact align with findings from the U.S. Federal Reserve and Reuters/Ipsos polls. The narrative includes specific factual anchors, such as names, institutions, and dates, enhancing its credibility. The language and tone are consistent with typical corporate and official language, and there is no excessive or off-topic detail unrelated to the claim.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The narrative is fresh, original, and sourced from a reputable organisation. The claims are plausible and supported by specific factual anchors. No significant credibility risks were identified.
Supercharge Your Content Strategy
Feel free to test this content on your social media sites to see whether it works for your community.
