The rise of generative artificial intelligence is transforming search engine optimisation, prompting a shift from traditional methods towards a focus on quality content, intent-driven strategies, and human-AI collaboration to navigate the evolving digital landscape.
The rapid ascent of generative artificial intelligence is reshaping the landscape of search engine optimisation (SEO), provoking debate over whether traditional SEO practices are becoming obsolete. The core of this discussion lies in how AI-powered tools, such as Google’s Search Generative Experience (SGE) and ChatGPT Search, deliver concise, direct answers to user queries, bypassing conventional search result pages and the need to click through multiple websites. According to a 2024 Gartner study, this trend could render up to 25% of search engines redundant by 2026, as AI chatbots and large language models supplant traditional search methods. This shift substantially alters user behaviour and poses significant challenges for website owners reliant on organic search traffic, with some predictions, including a Moz report, forecasting declines in organic traffic of up to 64% in certain sectors due to AI-generated responses dominating search results.
However, this evolution does not signify the end of SEO but rather its transformation. Digital marketers and content creators must reconsider and recalibrate their strategies in response to changing user behaviour. The rise of AI-generated overviews, which consolidate information from various sources into succinct answers directly on results pages, means fewer users are clicking through to websites. Data indicates that this ‘zero-click’ phenomenon now accounts for nearly 60% of Google searches, producing a 34.5% reduction in website clicks in some cases. This paradigm shift demands a move away from purely keyword-centric approaches towards intent-driven content that comprehensively addresses user queries in a conversational manner. For example, rather than targeting simplistic keywords like “best laptops 2025,” content should now answer nuanced questions such as “Which laptop is optimal for video editing and boasts long battery life?” This focus on understanding and addressing search intent aligns with insights from multiple industry reports highlighting the diminishing efficacy of keyword stuffing.
Crucially, the integration of AI in search has also ushered in a new era where quality content reigns supreme. Google’s evolving algorithms increasingly prioritise content that demonstrates Expertise, Experience, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness (EEAT). AI-generated content, though prolific, often lacks the depth and unique insight that human creativity and first-hand experience provide. Content that weaves personal anecdotes, expert opinions, and authentic user experiences resonates more deeply with both audiences and search engines. This human element remains the ultimate differentiator in an age of automated content generation, as AI tools, despite their vast analytical capabilities, are inherently unable to replicate emotional nuance or comprehensive human perspectives.
Interestingly, rather than supplanting SEO, AI tools are enhancing SEO strategies by improving efficiency and precision. Platforms like Surfer SEO and Clearscope enable marketers to analyse user intent, discover high-performing keywords, and predict ranking potential with greater accuracy. Generative AI tools such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini assist in creating topic clusters, meta descriptions, and FAQs, empowering marketers to make data-driven decisions while reducing ambiguity in content creation. This symbiotic relationship between human creativity and AI technology fosters smarter, more effective SEO practices rather than rendering SEO redundant.
The business landscape reflects these dynamics as well. Despite significant investments in agentic AI projects, Gartner’s June 2025 report indicates that over 40% of such initiatives may be discontinued by 2027 due to rising costs and unclear business value. This underscores the practical challenges of fully autonomous AI applications and reinforces the need for balanced, strategic adoption of AI technologies within marketing and SEO efforts.
Moreover, the broader market trend includes the emergence of Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), a burgeoning sector valued at $848 million in 2025 and projected to exceed $33 billion by 2034. This growth highlights increasing enterprise adoption of AI-powered search platforms, with nearly 79% of organisations deploying AI agents to some extent. GEO itself represents a new layer of optimisation focused on AI-driven search experiences, reflecting the accelerating shift towards AI-enhanced digital ecosystems.
In conclusion, while generative AI significantly disrupts traditional SEO by changing how users search and interact with online content, it does not herald SEO’s extinction. Instead, it invites a strategic evolution where content creators prioritise quality, depth, and authentic human engagement, leveraging AI tools as enablers rather than replacements. The future of SEO is likely to belong to those who balance human ingenuity with intelligent AI utilisation, producing content that not only satisfies algorithms but also builds enduring trust and connection with audiences.
📌 Reference Map:
- [1] (RS Web Solutions) – Paragraphs 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10
- [2] (Gartner) – Paragraphs 1, 4, 9
- [3] (Reuters) – Paragraph 7
- [4] (Wikipedia) – Paragraph 8
- [5] (Mondo) – Paragraphs 3, 4
- [6] (Nine Peaks) – Paragraph 3
- [7] (Binomial Tree) – Paragraph 3
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative presents recent developments in generative AI’s impact on SEO, with references to studies from 2024 and 2025. The earliest known publication date of similar content is May 2024, indicating a timely discussion. The article includes updated data but recycles older material, which may justify a higher freshness score but should still be flagged. The content is not republished across low-quality sites or clickbait networks.
Quotes check
Score:
7
Notes:
The article includes direct quotes from various sources. The earliest known usage of these quotes is from May 2024, suggesting they have been used in earlier material. Some quotes have identical wording, indicating potential reuse. Variations in quote wording are present, with differences noted. No online matches were found for some quotes, raising the score but flagging them as potentially original or exclusive content.
Source reliability
Score:
6
Notes:
The narrative originates from RS Web Solutions, a reputable organisation. However, the article includes references to various sources, some of which are obscure or unverifiable. For instance, the Wikipedia page on Generative Engine Optimization is cited, which may not be a primary source. Additionally, some organisations or companies mentioned in the report cannot be verified online, raising concerns about potential fabrication.
Plausability check
Score:
7
Notes:
The article discusses the impact of generative AI on SEO, a topic covered by multiple reputable outlets. For example, a Forbes article from May 2024 discusses similar themes. The narrative lacks specific factual anchors, such as names, institutions, or dates, which reduces the score and flags it as potentially synthetic. The language and tone are consistent with the region and topic, and the structure is focused on the claim without excessive or off-topic detail.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): OPEN
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The narrative presents timely information on the impact of generative AI on SEO, with references to recent studies and developments. However, the reuse of quotes and reliance on unverifiable sources raise concerns about originality and source reliability. The lack of specific factual anchors and potential synthetic content further diminish confidence in the narrative’s credibility.
Supercharge Your Content Strategy
Feel free to test this content on your social media sites to see whether it works for your community.
