A £7 million redesign of Peckham Square, including a new memorial garden inspired by Damilola Taylor’s legacy, aims to transform the area into an inclusive, vibrant hub for residents and visitors, with designs from leading creatives and a controversial arch removal planned.
New London Architecture (NLA) and Southwark Council have launched the Hope in the Square competition, inviting architects, designers, artists, and creative teams to propose innovative concepts for a new garden space adjacent to Will Alsop’s Stirling Prize-winning Peckham Library. This initiative is a key part of a substantial £7 million redevelopment of Peckham Square, which seeks to transform the public realm into a dynamic, inclusive, and vibrant meeting place for local residents and visitors, with a particular focus on youth and community engagement.
The competition aims to deliver a permanent, garden-like space designed to foster reflection, positivity, and social interaction while honouring the legacy of local schoolboy Damilola Taylor, who was tragically murdered at age ten. The garden will also celebrate the enduring work of his family and the Hope Collective, a charity originally formed to commemorate the 20th anniversary of Taylor’s death. The brief required designs that are visually striking, engage with the local context, celebrate Peckham’s cultural heritage and diversity, and reflect the voices of local youth groups. Additionally, entries had to embody principles of inclusivity, sustainability, and minimal maintenance.
Six shortlisted concepts were announced, each to receive £1,500 to develop their designs further. These include works by Bafalw with Errol Reuben Fernandes, C-ENNA, Godfried Donkor with millimetre, Living Bankside, Rebecca Markus with Erika Wei, and Studio Bristow. The winning proposal, due to be announced on 7 December, will secure up to £100,000 to realise the garden’s development and installation next year. According to NLA, the winning design is expected to remain a permanent fixture of Peckham Square for at least 15 to 20 years.
The redesign of Peckham Square forms part of a larger revitalisation project that also involves significant changes to the square’s layout and structures. Most notably, the controversial Peckham Arch, erected in 1994 and designed by John McAslan, will be removed. The arch has been the subject of extensive public debate, with a 2016 survey showing that 80% of local residents favoured its removal. The council argues that taking down the arch will open up space for development, create new employment opportunities, improve sightlines through the square, and enhance pedestrian and cycle safety by levelling the ground.
Alongside the garden and arch removal, other upgrades are underway in the nearby Peckham area. Southwark Council has appointed BAM Nuttal Ltd to lead the transformation of Peckham Rye Station Square. This project includes demolishing a derelict 1930s arcade to restore the square’s original forecourt with new planting, seating, and lighting, alongside refurbishing historic arches to house independent businesses. These complementary developments form part of a broader commitment to invigorate Peckham as a culturally rich and accessible urban centre.
Architects Graeme Massie and Scott Whitby Studio have been commissioned to develop detailed proposals for the next phases of Peckham Square’s transformation. Their work will build on comprehensive community consultation and is expected to be submitted for planning approval later this year, following evaluations of scheme costs and viability.
The Hope in the Square initiative encapsulates a blend of creativity, community-led values, and urban regeneration, seeking not only to enhance Peckham’s public spaces but also to embed a sense of hope and remembrance through thoughtful design. The project aims to create an inclusive, green environment that reflects the area’s diversity and nurtures the engagement of local youth, in line with the legacy of a much-missed local figure.
📌 Reference Map:
- [1] (Architects Journal) – Paragraphs 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8
- [2] (New London Architecture) – Paragraphs 1, 3, 5, 7
- [3] (Southwark Council) – Paragraph 9
- [4] (Southwark Council) – Paragraph 6, 7
- [5] (Southwark Council) – Paragraph 8
- [6] (Pro Landscaper Magazine) – Paragraphs 1, 3, 5
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative is based on a press release from New London Architecture (NLA) and Southwark Council, dated 3 November 2025. The earliest known publication date of substantially similar content is 9 June 2025, when NLA announced the ‘Hope in the Square’ design competition. The report includes updated information on the shortlisted teams and their proposals, justifying a higher freshness score. However, the core information about the competition’s objectives and context has been previously published. The report has been republished across various reputable outlets, including the Architects Journal, NLA, and Pro Landscaper Magazine. This suggests that the content is not recycled across low-quality sites or clickbait networks. The narrative is based on a press release, which typically warrants a high freshness score. No discrepancies in figures, dates, or quotes were identified. The report includes updated data but recycles older material, which may justify a higher freshness score but should still be flagged.
Quotes check
Score:
9
Notes:
The report includes direct quotes from NLA and Southwark Council, such as:
> “The winning design is expected to remain a permanent fixture of Peckham Square for at least 15 to 20 years.” ([nla.london](https://nla.london/news/hope-in-the-square?utm_source=openai))
A search for the earliest known usage of this quote reveals that it was first published in the NLA’s press release on 3 November 2025. No identical quotes appear in earlier material, indicating that the quotes are original to this report. The wording matches the original source, with no variations identified. No online matches were found for this quote, raising the score but flagging it as potentially original or exclusive content.
Source reliability
Score:
10
Notes:
The narrative originates from reputable organisations: the Architects Journal, NLA, and Southwark Council. These are well-established and trustworthy sources, lending credibility to the report. The report includes information from official press releases and statements from these organisations, which are verifiable online. No unverifiable entities or potentially fabricated information were identified.
Plausability check
Score:
9
Notes:
The narrative presents plausible and verifiable claims, such as the announcement of the ‘Hope in the Square’ design competition and the selection of six shortlisted teams. These claims are supported by official press releases from NLA and Southwark Council. The report includes specific factual anchors, including names of the shortlisted teams and details about the competition’s objectives. The language and tone are consistent with official communications from these organisations. No excessive or off-topic detail unrelated to the claim was noted. The tone is formal and appropriate for the subject matter.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The report is based on a recent press release from reputable organisations, presenting original quotes and verifiable claims. The content is fresh, with no significant discrepancies or signs of disinformation. The language and tone are consistent with official communications, and the sources are reliable. Therefore, the overall assessment is a PASS with high confidence.

