A sharp rise in the number of young people in the UK who have never worked or are disengaged from education and employment raises concerns about the country’s future economic mobility and social inequality, with regional disparities highlighting the complexity of solutions required.
The number of young people in the UK who have never worked is rising significantly, sparking concern among policymakers and social analysts about the future of youth employment and social mobility. According to a report by the Resolution Foundation, 65% of individuals born between 1996 and 2000 had never held a job by the age of 17, a sharp increase from 38% for those born between 1981 and 1985. This shift is partly attributed to legislative changes requiring young people to remain in education until the age of 18, which has led to a higher percentage of 16 and 17-year-olds staying in full-time education—increasing from 75% in 2005 to 86% this year.
Despite more young people staying in education, worrying disparities exist in the number of teenagers not in education, employment, or training (NEET). Across the UK, 4-5% of 16-17-year-olds are classified as NEET, but this figure varies starkly by region—from just 1% in Barnet to a striking 21.5% in Dudley. The Resolution Foundation warns that early disengagement from education or work at this critical age greatly increases the risk of longer-term unemployment or lower-paid jobs later in life, underscoring the profound impact of early career setbacks.
More recent data from the Office for National Statistics shows that youth disengagement is rising more broadly. Between October and December 2024, 13.4% of 16 to 24-year-olds in the UK were NEET, totaling nearly one million young people. This represents an increase from 12.1% in the same period the previous year. The NEET rate specifically for 16-17-year-olds rose to 4.6%, up from 3.9%, highlighting a continuing upward trajectory. Meanwhile, unemployment among young people aged 16 to 24 remains high, with over 620,000 reported as unemployed in mid-2025 and a youth unemployment rate above 13%.
The Trades Union Congress (TUC) emphasises the urgency of addressing these challenges through structured support systems to help reintegrate young people into education, employment, or training. Their analysis points to the long-term negative consequences of NEET status, including persistent unemployment and economic inactivity among young adults. The TUC reports that as of mid-2025, 15% of those aged 18-24 were NEET, with 6% unemployed and 11% economically inactive—addressing this demographic’s needs is critical to preventing entrenched socio-economic disadvantage.
The Department for Education’s annual NEET statistics corroborate the trend of rising disengagement among 16-17-year-olds since the Raising the Participation Age legislation was introduced. Although the law has increased the length of time young people spend in education, it has not fully eliminated the risks of youth disengagement. The NEET proportion at this age is increasing, suggesting that policy adjustments may be required to provide alternative pathways into work or training.
On a more optimistic note, longer-term data from the Resolution Foundation’s broader ‘Not Working’ report points to improvements in youth worklessness over the past few decades, particularly among young women. Between 1995 and 2021, worklessness among 18-24-year-olds decreased from 22% to 15%, with young women benefiting from a much larger reduction than their male counterparts. This highlights that while challenges remain, progress is possible through targeted interventions.
The growing portion of teenagers and young adults who remain outside education and work underscores a complex challenge for the UK in fostering skills development and economic inclusion. The varying regional rates of NEET status and worklessness indicate that solutions will require tailored local strategies as well as national policy frameworks. Without addressing this issue, there is a risk that a significant fraction of the next generation could face enduring economic hardship and reduced life chances.
📌 Reference Map:
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
7
Notes:
The narrative presents recent data on youth worklessness, including statistics from mid-2025, indicating a high freshness score. However, similar reports from the Resolution Foundation and the Department for Work and Pensions have been published earlier in 2024, suggesting that the core content may have been recycled. The inclusion of updated data justifies a higher freshness score but should still be flagged. ([resolutionfoundation.org](https://www.resolutionfoundation.org/publications/left-behind/?utm_source=openai))
Quotes check
Score:
6
Notes:
The narrative includes direct quotes from the Trades Union Congress (TUC) and the Department for Education. A search reveals that similar statements have been made by these organisations in previous reports, indicating potential reuse of content. However, no exact matches were found for the specific wording used in this narrative, suggesting some originality.
Source reliability
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative cites reputable organisations such as the Resolution Foundation, the Office for National Statistics, and the Trades Union Congress. These sources are well-established and credible, lending strength to the report’s reliability.
Plausability check
Score:
7
Notes:
The claims regarding rising youth worklessness and the impact of ill health on employment prospects are consistent with recent studies and reports. The inclusion of specific statistics and references to reputable sources enhances the plausibility of the narrative. However, the lack of direct quotes from the TUC and the Department for Education raises questions about the authenticity of the statements attributed to them.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): OPEN
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The narrative presents recent data on youth worklessness, incorporating updated statistics from mid-2025, which enhances its freshness. However, the core content appears to be recycled from earlier reports published in 2024, and some quotes may have been reused, raising concerns about originality. While the sources cited are reputable, the lack of direct quotes from the TUC and the Department for Education diminishes the authenticity of the statements attributed to them. Given these factors, the overall assessment is OPEN with a MEDIUM confidence level.
Supercharge Your Content Strategy
Feel free to test this content on your social media sites to see whether it works for your community.
