As organisations move from experimental AI projects to scaled implementation, 2026 will be the pivotal year where regulatory compliance, security, and a critical skills gap challenge the true value of AI, reshaping the channel landscape.
If 2025 was the year the channel pivoted to AI, 2026 will be the year that pivot is audited in practice. Organisations and their partners are shifting from experimentation and pilot projects to adoption at scale, and that transition is exposing whether earlier investments were strategic or merely slideware. According to the report by IT Pro, customers and partners alike will prioritise measurable ROI, governance, security and practical outcomes over novelty. [1][2][3]
AI will no longer be deployed in isolation; it will come with legal and regulatory obligations. Governments and standards bodies are moving from guidance to enforcement, with offices such as the EU AI Office preparing to supervise compliance for general-purpose models and to impose timelines for governance frameworks that demand transparency, human oversight and documented risk controls. This regulatory tightening turns explainability and auditability from optional features into procurement prerequisites. [1][2]
For channel partners the commercial model changes from transaction to stewardship. Partners will be judged less on the number of tools they can resell and more on their ability to advise on bias, security, compliance and responsible adoption across hybrid and edge environments. The IT Pro analysis argues partners must shift to become trusted AI and risk advisors offering billable compliance services rather than ticking boxes. [1][2]
The single biggest constraint on that shift is people. Industry forecasts show a severe shortage of the specialised roles needed to operationalise AI at scale. IDC warns that by 2026 over 90% of organisations will feel the effects of an IT skills crisis, producing substantial losses from delays and reduced competitiveness, while Pluralsight’s 2026 Tech Forecast and the AI Workforce Consortium report highlight shortages in AI architects, ML engineers, cloud governance experts and ethics and security specialists. These gaps threaten deal sizes, slow delivery and push partners toward acquisitive hiring strategies. [4][3][5]
That skills gap is already prompting investment in training and reskilling. CompTIA has launched an “AI Essentials” programme aimed at equipping non‑technical staff with practical generative AI skills, reflecting industry calls for continuous learning to prevent skills atrophy and to ensure organisations can capture value from AI tools. Employers that combine targeted upskilling with strategic hires will be better placed to operationalise AI. [6][3]
Security and identity hygiene become the price of entry. Integrated security platforms with real‑time threat analytics, AI‑driven detection and automated response will be expected rather than sold as premium extras, and boardrooms will increasingly focus on machine and non‑human identity protection as agents proliferate inside enterprises. Reports of shortages in AI security expertise further amplify these risks and mean partners must bundle security and governance into core offerings. [1][5]
Sustainability, sovereignty and infrastructure resilience are rising up procurement checklists. The carbon footprint of large models and datacentre energy use is attracting regulatory and investor attention, while demand for residency, auditability and control over data flows is creating opportunities for “sovereignty‑by‑design” services. Meanwhile, hardware constraints are beginning to bite: IDC and industry analysts warn that memory redirected to AI infrastructure could shrink consumer PC markets and push up costs, reinforcing the need to optimise hybrid cloud and edge deployments for both performance and resilience. [1][2][7]
The uncomfortable truth for 2026 is that the year will be more consequential, not easier, than 2025. Compliance, governance, security and sustainability stop being optional value‑adds and become baseline expectations. Yet for partners prepared to move beyond selling technology and invest in skills, processes and accountable services, the shift represents a significant commercial opportunity: the market will reward those who can translate AI capacity into measurable business outcomes. [1][3][4]
##Reference Map:
- [1] (IT Pro) – Paragraph 1, Paragraph 2, Paragraph 3, Paragraph 6, Paragraph 7, Paragraph 8
- [2] (IT Pro summary) – Paragraph 1, Paragraph 3, Paragraph 7
- [3] (Pluralsight) – Paragraph 1, Paragraph 4, Paragraph 5, Paragraph 8
- [4] (IDC) – Paragraph 4, Paragraph 7, Paragraph 8
- [5] (AI Workforce Consortium via IT Pro) – Paragraph 4, Paragraph 6
- [6] (CompTIA) – Paragraph 5
- [7] (Tom’s Hardware / IDC memory warning) – Paragraph 7
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative presents projections for AI adoption in 2026, referencing reports from IT Pro, Pluralsight, IDC, and CompTIA. The earliest known publication date for similar content is November 12, 2025, when Pluralsight released its 2026 Tech Forecast. ([pluralsight.com](https://www.pluralsight.com/newsroom/press-releases/pluralsight-unveils-2026-tech-forecast–ai-hype-deflates–skills?utm_source=openai)) The narrative includes updated data but recycles older material, which may justify a higher freshness score but should still be flagged. The content is not republished across low-quality sites or clickbait networks. The narrative is based on a press release, which typically warrants a high freshness score. No discrepancies in figures, dates, or quotes were found. No similar content appeared more than 7 days earlier. The update may justify a higher freshness score but should still be flagged.
Quotes check
Score:
9
Notes:
The narrative includes direct quotes from reports by IT Pro, Pluralsight, IDC, and CompTIA. The earliest known usage of these quotes is from the respective reports published in November 2025 and December 2025. No identical quotes appear in earlier material, indicating original content. No variations in quote wording were found.
Source reliability
Score:
9
Notes:
The narrative originates from reputable organizations: IT Pro, Pluralsight, IDC, and CompTIA. These organizations are well-known and credible in the technology and business sectors. No unverifiable entities are mentioned.
Plausability check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative presents plausible projections for AI adoption in 2026, supported by reports from reputable organizations. Time-sensitive claims, such as the projected AI skills gap and the need for upskilling, are consistent with recent online information. The narrative is covered elsewhere, reducing suspicion. The report includes specific factual anchors, such as names, institutions, and dates. The language and tone are consistent with the region and topic. The structure is focused on the claim, without excessive or off-topic detail. The tone is formal and appropriate for corporate or official language.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The narrative presents projections for AI adoption in 2026, supported by recent reports from reputable organizations. The content is original, with no evidence of recycled material or disinformation. The sources are reliable, and the claims are plausible and consistent with current information.
Supercharge Your Content Strategy
Feel free to test this content on your social media sites to see whether it works for your community.
